New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix bug in NANOAOD Pileup_nTrueInt variable (int instead of float) #36850
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36850/28076
|
A new Pull Request was created by @kirschen (Henning Kirschenmann) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @fgolf can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ddd366/22123/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummaryThe workflows 1001.0, 1000.0, 136.88811, 136.874, 136.8311, 136.793, 136.7611, 136.731, 4.22 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
@kirschen we can restrict the precision to two digits https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/pull/36850/files#diff-1cdb6ca4228b4d9648f21393c825c9eee4b4a10681fa06021432dc607298bb8dR87-R90 |
Hi @mariadalfonso , |
…rueInt for PU<100
Tested several precision options for addColumnValue. "10" seems to give close to two-digit precision, see attached plots and scan with other options below (first few PU>50 values)
Pileup_nTrueInt_Full_Minus_P10_PUGT50.pdf |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36850/28268
|
Pull request #36850 was updated. @cmsbuild, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @fgolf can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ddd366/22407/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+xpog |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Follow-up of thread "Pileup_nTrueInt in nanoAOD v9"
https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/physTools/3811/1/1/1.html
PR validation:
Ran
runTheMatrix.py -l 1325.81 --sites ""
and in a second step adapted the input to a sample with flatPU distribution (runTheMatrix sample has integer true PU 35). Output is as expected:
Whereas previous nanoAOD had integer values for Pileup_nTrueInt, e.g. (from the same dataset as used for the test above)