New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MTD validation : update modules' names #36913
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36913/28223
|
A new Pull Request was created by @fabiocos (Fabio Cossutti) for master. It involves the following packages:
@civanch, @emanueleusai, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @ahmad3213, @pmandrik, @pbo0, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
@gsorrentino18 FYI |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a18be1/22291/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 1001.0, 1000.0, 136.88811, 136.874, 136.8311, 136.793, 136.7611, 136.731, 4.22 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
The failures in DQM comparison look unrelated to this PR (and I see them mentioned in other discussions in Mattermost) |
+1 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
The name of MTD validation modules is updated by adding the suffix "Valid" to allow them to be better identified within the stack of executed plugins.
PR validation:
Test workflow 35007.0 runs succesfully.