New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Load Accelerators_cff unconditionally in customizeHLTforPatatrack.py, and clean up GPU/CPU forcing functions #37063
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37063/28514
|
A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @missirol, @Martin-Grunewald can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
I believe with the functionality introduced in #36699 these functions would be unnecessary cmssw/HLTrigger/Configuration/python/customizeHLTforPatatrack.py Lines 39 to 49 in 4e650d8
If you want, I can clean them up in this PR (or leave them up to you). |
@cmsbuild, please test |
enable gpu |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-28b847/22665/summary.html GPU Comparison SummarySummary:
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@makortel , in #36699 (comment) I see the suggestion was about using |
Yes, the should be replaced by the use of the new functionality.
Sure, please remove them :-) |
4e650d8
to
d12cf09
Compare
Thanks @missirol for catching! I was being sloppy, I changed the
Done. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37063/28525
|
Pull request #37063 was updated. @cmsbuild, @missirol, @Martin-Grunewald can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-28b847/22675/summary.html GPU Comparison SummarySummary:
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+hlt (the many tiny differences in the outputs of wf 11634.506 are a known feature, not related to this PR) |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Follow-up to #36699 (comment). Also clean up
forceGpuOffload()
andresetGpuOffload()
functions in favor ofprocess.options.accelerators
that was added in #36699.PR validation:
None