New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add tests for Skeleton templates #37125
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37125/28650
|
A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @makortel can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
@smuzaffar, could you review this one? |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-906b1b/22792/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test for slc7_aarch64_gcc11 lets tests this for non-x86_64 archs |
please test for slc7_ppc64le_gcc11 |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test DRNTest had ERRORS RelVals
|
5e648c8
to
4e1c69b
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37125/28788
|
Pull request #37125 was updated. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @makortel can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-906b1b/23023/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 1001.0, 1000.0, 136.88811, 136.874, 136.8311, 136.793, 136.7611, 136.731, 4.22 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
@smuzaffar Anything else? |
No @makortel all look good now |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR addresses partially #29850 by adding tests that include
code-checks
,code-format
, and compilation (for selected subsets of the skeletons), following the suggestion in #29850 (comment)PR validation:
Unit tests run.