Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update CLCT thresholds for hadronic showers in CSC #37266

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 8, 2022

Conversation

kakwok
Copy link
Contributor

@kakwok kakwok commented Mar 18, 2022

PR description:

This PR updates CLCT thresholds for hadronic showers in the emulator. This change is to reflect the latest FW to be deployed in the old TMBs (ring 2 and 3), where the HMT bits of the CLCTs will be a simple pass-through. CLCT thresholds for the corresponding chambers should be zeroed in the emulator.

This proposal has been presented at the CSC Trigger meeting[1] and L1 Muon DPG meeting by @Nik-Menendez

[1] CSC Trigger meeting
[2] L1 Muon DPG

PR validation:

Validated the L1+HLT workflow with the hadronic shower trigger paths on signal MC samples in a private setup.

  • CMSSW_12_3_0_pre5
  • L1 Menu: L1Menu_Collisions2022_v0_1_2.xml
  • HLT config: kakwok/CSCCluster_12_3_X_signalsPath/V3

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37266/28896

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @kakwok for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • L1Trigger/CSCTriggerPrimitives (l1)

@epalencia, @cmsbuild, @cecilecaillol, @rekovic can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@giovanni-mocellin, @eyigitba, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @ptcox, @valuev this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@epalencia
Copy link
Contributor

Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-dd470e/23200/summary.html
COMMIT: 8d4b00f
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-17-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/37266/23200/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals-INPUT

  • 136.8311136.8311_RunJetHT2017F_reminiaod+RunJetHT2017F_reminiaod+REMINIAOD_data2017+HARVEST2017_REMINIAOD_data2017/step2_RunJetHT2017F_reminiaod+RunJetHT2017F_reminiaod+REMINIAOD_data2017+HARVEST2017_REMINIAOD_data2017.log
  • 136.83136.83_RunDoubleMuon2017F+RunDoubleMuon2017F+HLTDR2_2017+RECODR2_2017reHLT_Prompt+HARVEST2017/step2_RunDoubleMuon2017F+RunDoubleMuon2017F+HLTDR2_2017+RECODR2_2017reHLT_Prompt+HARVEST2017.log
  • 136.829136.829_RunDoubleEG2017F+RunDoubleEG2017F+HLTDR2_2017+RECODR2_2017reHLT_skimDoubleEG_Prompt+HARVEST2017_skimDoubleEG/step2_RunDoubleEG2017F+RunDoubleEG2017F+HLTDR2_2017+RECODR2_2017reHLT_skimDoubleEG_Prompt+HARVEST2017_skimDoubleEG.log
Expand to see more relval errors ...

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3695728
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 56
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3695649
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 204 log files, 45 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@kakwok
Copy link
Contributor Author

kakwok commented Apr 7, 2022

@epalencia I didn't expect simply changing the thresholds would cause the failed tests, I also couldn't get any useful indication of the problem when the logs were available.
Could you trigger the test again to see if it still fails?

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Apr 7, 2022

please test
(Errors were quite likely unrelated: the previous tests have anyhow become too old by now)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 8, 2022

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-dd470e/23751/summary.html
COMMIT: 8d4b00f
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-04-07-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/37266/23751/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3593039
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 42
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3592975
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 200 log files, 45 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@cecilecaillol
Copy link
Contributor

+l1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 8, 2022

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Apr 8, 2022

+1

  • Changes in the emulator in view of the new Endcap Shower Trigger were discussed within the CSC Trigger group and with L1T

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants