pT dependent ROI producers for Muon HLT #37286

khaosmos93 · 2022-03-21T11:03:26Z

This PR adds two new tracking region producers with pt parametrized ROI sizes for the inside-out track reconstruction in Muon HLT. These modules are minimally changed from the existing modules:

RecoMuon/GlobalTrackingTools/interface/MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder.h is updated from RecoMuon/GlobalTrackingTools/interface/MuonTrackingRegionBuilder.h
RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions/plugins/L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer.h is updated from RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions/plugins/CandidateSeededTrackingRegionsProducer.h

Initial performance study was presented at the TSG meeting by @wonpoint4: https://indico.cern.ch/event/1131517/contributions/4751084/attachments/2396360/4097442/220223_TSG_MuonROI_wonjun.pdf

Significant efficiency gain at low pT, e.g. 75% to 95% at 4 GeV, with a cost of up to around 10 ms timing increase and O(10%) of rate increase for low-pT muon triggers (no significant impact on the total rates).
The final ROI parameter tuning (python configuration level changes) to balance between efficiency and timing/rates is ongoing.

FYI: @JanFSchulte @wonpoint4

cmsbuild · 2022-03-21T11:13:46Z

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37286/28914

This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

cmsbuild · 2022-03-21T11:14:05Z

A new Pull Request was created by @khaosmos93 (Minseok Oh) for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoMuon/GlobalTrackingTools (reconstruction)
RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions (reconstruction)

@jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@felicepantaleo, @abbiendi, @CeliaFernandez, @mmusich, @cericeci, @JanFSchulte, @jhgoh, @dgulhan, @sscruz, @trocino, @rociovilar, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @bellan, @ebrondol, @mtosi, @amagitte, @HuguesBrun, @Fedespring, @calderona, @gpetruc this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

missirol · 2022-03-21T21:30:32Z

Hi @khaosmos93 , one question from HLT: would this update eventually be needed in HLT menus for 12_3_X? If so, do you plan to backport this PR to 12_3_X in time for 12_3_0?

JanFSchulte · 2022-03-21T22:51:31Z

Hi @missirol, the answer is yes, we would need this backported to 12_3_X.

missirol · 2022-03-21T23:11:22Z

Hi @missirol, the answer is yes, we would need this backported to 12_3_X.

Okay, good to know, will keep an eye on this (cc: @Martin-Grunewald , @silviodonato).

mmusich · 2022-03-22T11:50:43Z

RecoMuon/GlobalTrackingTools/interface/MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder.h

+  explicit MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder(const edm::ParameterSet& par, edm::ConsumesCollector&& iC) { build(par, iC); }
+
+  /// Destructor
+  ~MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder() override {}


could be default.

mmusich · 2022-03-22T11:55:34Z

RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions/plugins/L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer.h

+          iC.consumes<MeasurementTrackerEvent>(regPSet.getParameter<edm::InputTag>("measurementTrackerName"));
+    }
+    m_searchOpt = false;
+    if (regPSet.exists("searchOpt"))


I think this practice is discouraged: #36261

mmusich · 2022-03-22T11:56:47Z

RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions/plugins/L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer.h

+        if (!valid_charge)
+          charge = 0;
+
+        int link = 36 + (int)(it->tfMuonIndex() / 3.);


magic numbers

move to static constexpr

mmusich · 2022-03-22T11:56:56Z

RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions/plugins/L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer.h

+
+        int link = 36 + (int)(it->tfMuonIndex() / 3.);
+        bool barrel = true;
+        if ((link >= 36 && link <= 41) || (link >= 66 && link <= 71))


more magic numbers

move to static constexpr

mmusich · 2022-03-22T11:57:10Z

RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions/plugins/L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer.h

+        GlobalTrajectoryParameters param(pos, mom, charge, &*service_->magneticField());
+
+        AlgebraicSymMatrix55 mat;
+        mat[0][0] = (0.25 / pt) * (0.25 / pt);  // sigma^2(charge/abs_momentum)


some more magic numbers.

move to static constexpr

mmusich · 2022-03-22T12:00:05Z

RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions/plugins/L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer.h

+      edm::Handle<MeasurementTrackerEvent> hmte;
+      iEvent.getByToken(token_measurementTracker, hmte);
+      measurementTracker = hmte.product();


Suggested change

edm::Handle<MeasurementTrackerEvent> hmte;

iEvent.getByToken(token_measurementTracker, hmte);

measurementTracker = hmte.product();

measurementTracker = &iEvent.get(token_measurementTracker);

I think this whole section could be simplified.

mmusich · 2022-03-22T12:00:30Z

RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions/plugins/L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer.h

+        if (pt < l1MinPt_ || std::abs(eta) > l1MaxEta_)
+          continue;
+
+        float theta = 2 * atan(exp(-eta));


isn't this very expensive in a double loop? (note that I don't have a good suggestion to overcome this as you need it also to construct the momentum vector below - given the dataformat - , but maybe some of the reviewers have)

mmusich · 2022-03-22T12:10:41Z

RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions/plugins/L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer.h

+  bool m_precise;
+  edm::EDGetTokenT<MeasurementTrackerEvent> token_measurementTracker;
+  RectangularEtaPhiTrackingRegion::UseMeasurementTracker m_whereToUseMeasurementTracker;
+  edm::ESGetToken<MagneticField, IdealMagneticFieldRecord> token_field;


could be const

mmusich · 2022-03-22T12:12:36Z

RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions/plugins/L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer.h

+            pt = minPtBarrel_;
+        } else {
+          // ME2
+          theid = theta < Geom::pi() / 2. ? CSCDetId(1, 2, 0, 0, 0) : CSCDetId(2, 2, 0, 0, 0);


any reason why it can't be M_PI ?

clacaputo · 2022-03-22T22:59:03Z

RecoMuon/GlobalTrackingTools/src/MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder.cc

+  // Flag to use precise??
+  thePrecise = par.getParameter<bool>("precise");
+
+  // perigee reference point ToDo: Check this


What does ToDo: Check this means here? Do you have some issues?

sry, it's something I forgot to remove from the old code.

clacaputo · 2022-03-23T16:02:11Z

RecoMuon/GlobalTrackingTools/interface/MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder.h

+
+  /// Add Fill Descriptions
+  static void fillDescriptions(edm::ConfigurationDescriptions& descriptions);
+  static void fillDescriptionsHLT(edm::ParameterSetDescription& descriptions);


if you are not planning to do something like this

cmssw/RecoMuon/GlobalTrackingTools/src/MuonTrackingRegionBuilder.cc

Lines 268 to 339 in f2bf00c

void MuonTrackingRegionBuilder::fillDescriptions(edm::ConfigurationDescriptions& descriptions) {

{

edm::ParameterSetDescription desc;

fillDescriptionsOffline(desc);

descriptions.add("MuonTrackingRegionBuilder", desc);

}

{

edm::ParameterSetDescription desc;

fillDescriptionsHLT(desc);

descriptions.add("MuonTrackingRegionBuilderHLT", desc);

}

descriptions.setComment(

"Build a TrackingRegion around a standalone muon. Options to define region around beamspot or primary vertex and "

"dynamic regions are included.");

}

void MuonTrackingRegionBuilder::fillDescriptionsHLT(edm::ParameterSetDescription& desc) {

desc.add<double>("EtaR_UpperLimit_Par1", 0.25);

desc.add<double>("DeltaR", 0.2);

desc.add<edm::InputTag>("beamSpot", edm::InputTag("hltOnlineBeamSpot"));

desc.add<int>("OnDemand", -1);

desc.add<edm::InputTag>("vertexCollection", edm::InputTag("pixelVertices"));

desc.add<double>("Rescale_phi", 3.0);

desc.add<bool>("Eta_fixed", false);

desc.add<double>("Rescale_eta", 3.0);

desc.add<double>("PhiR_UpperLimit_Par2", 0.2);

desc.add<double>("Eta_min", 0.05);

desc.add<bool>("Phi_fixed", false);

desc.add<double>("Phi_min", 0.05);

desc.add<double>("PhiR_UpperLimit_Par1", 0.6);

desc.add<double>("EtaR_UpperLimit_Par2", 0.15);

desc.add<edm::InputTag>("MeasurementTrackerName", edm::InputTag("hltESPMeasurementTracker"));

desc.add<bool>("UseVertex", false);

desc.add<double>("Rescale_Dz", 3.0);

desc.add<bool>("Pt_fixed", false);

desc.add<bool>("Z_fixed", true);

desc.add<double>("Pt_min", 1.5);

desc.add<double>("DeltaZ", 15.9);

desc.add<double>("DeltaEta", 0.2);

desc.add<double>("DeltaPhi", 0.2);

desc.add<int>("maxRegions", 1);

desc.add<bool>("precise", true);

desc.add<edm::InputTag>("input", edm::InputTag("hltL2Muons", "UpdatedAtVtx"));

}

void MuonTrackingRegionBuilder::fillDescriptionsOffline(edm::ParameterSetDescription& desc) {

desc.add<double>("EtaR_UpperLimit_Par1", 0.25);

desc.add<double>("DeltaR", 0.2);

desc.add<edm::InputTag>("beamSpot", edm::InputTag(""));

desc.add<int>("OnDemand", -1);

desc.add<edm::InputTag>("vertexCollection", edm::InputTag(""));

desc.add<double>("Rescale_phi", 3.0);

desc.add<bool>("Eta_fixed", false);

desc.add<double>("Rescale_eta", 3.0);

desc.add<double>("PhiR_UpperLimit_Par2", 0.2);

desc.add<double>("Eta_min", 0.05);

desc.add<bool>("Phi_fixed", false);

desc.add<double>("Phi_min", 0.05);

desc.add<double>("PhiR_UpperLimit_Par1", 0.6);

desc.add<double>("EtaR_UpperLimit_Par2", 0.15);

desc.add<edm::InputTag>("MeasurementTrackerName", edm::InputTag(""));

desc.add<bool>("UseVertex", false);

desc.add<double>("Rescale_Dz", 3.0);

desc.add<bool>("Pt_fixed", false);

desc.add<bool>("Z_fixed", true);

desc.add<double>("Pt_min", 1.5);

desc.add<double>("DeltaZ", 15.9);

desc.add<double>("DeltaEta", 0.2);

desc.add<double>("DeltaPhi", 0.2);

desc.add<int>("maxRegions", 1);

desc.add<bool>("precise", true);

desc.add<edm::InputTag>("input", edm::InputTag(""));

}

, you can remove it

clacaputo · 2022-03-23T16:02:26Z

RecoMuon/GlobalTrackingTools/interface/MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder.h

+  /// Add Fill Descriptions
+  static void fillDescriptions(edm::ConfigurationDescriptions& descriptions);
+  static void fillDescriptionsHLT(edm::ParameterSetDescription& descriptions);
+  static void fillDescriptionsOffline(edm::ParameterSetDescription& descriptions);


clacaputo · 2022-03-23T16:06:23Z

RecoMuon/GlobalTrackingTools/interface/MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder.h

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+#ifndef RecoMuon_TrackingTools_MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder_H


Suggested change

#ifndef RecoMuon_TrackingTools_MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder_H

#ifndef RecoMuon_GlobalTrackingTools_MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder_h

clacaputo · 2022-03-23T16:07:18Z

RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions/plugins/L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer.h

@@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
+#ifndef L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer_h


Suggested change

#ifndef L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer_h

#ifndef RecoTracker_TkTrackingRegions_L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer_h

clacaputo · 2022-03-23T16:07:36Z

RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions/plugins/L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer.h

@@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
+#ifndef L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer_h
+#define L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer_h


Suggested change

#define L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer_h

#define RecoTracker_TkTrackingRegions_L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer_h

clacaputo · 2022-03-23T16:08:25Z

RecoMuon/GlobalTrackingTools/interface/MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder.h

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+#ifndef RecoMuon_TrackingTools_MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder_H
+#define RecoMuon_TrackingTools_MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder_H


Suggested change

#define RecoMuon_TrackingTools_MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder_H

#define RecoMuon_GlobalTrackingTools_MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder_h

clacaputo · 2022-03-23T17:12:05Z

This PR adds two new tracking region producers with pt parametrized ROI sizes for the inside-out track reconstruction in Muon HLT. These modules are minimally changed from the existing modules:

RecoMuon/GlobalTrackingTools/interface/MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder.h is updated from RecoMuon/GlobalTrackingTools/interface/MuonTrackingRegionBuilder.h

RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions/plugins/L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer.h is updated from RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions/plugins/CandidateSeededTrackingRegionsProducer.h

Initial performance study was presented at the TSG meeting by @wonpoint4: https://indico.cern.ch/event/1131517/contributions/4751084/attachments/2396360/4097442/220223_TSG_MuonROI_wonjun.pdf

Significant efficiency gain at low pT, e.g. 75% to 95% at 4 GeV, with a cost of up to around 10 ms timing increase and O(10%) of rate increase for low-pT muon triggers (no significant impact on the total rates).

The final ROI parameter tuning (python configuration level changes) to balance between efficiency and timing/rates is ongoing.

FYI: @JanFSchulte @wonpoint4

Hi @khaosmos93 , on which workflow did you test it?

clacaputo · 2022-03-25T15:47:03Z

@cmsbuild please test

JanFSchulte · 2022-03-25T16:05:40Z

Just fyi, Minseok is moving to Europe currently, so questions and comments will be addressed next week.

cmsbuild · 2022-03-25T20:26:48Z

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-60bbc1/23395/summary.html
COMMIT: f2bf00c
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-25-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/37286/23395/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

No significant changes to the logs found
Reco comparison results: 3501 differences found in the comparisons
DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3695650
DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 51917
DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 59
DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3643652
DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
Checked 204 log files, 45 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
TriggerResults: no differences found

cmsbuild · 2022-03-31T11:25:38Z

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37286/29107

This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

cmsbuild · 2022-03-31T11:25:59Z

Pull request #37286 was updated. @jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

khaosmos93 · 2022-03-31T11:31:30Z

Thank you very much for your comments, @mmusich, @clacaputo! I tried to address most of them.
These modules are used only in the HLT and therefore tested with the latest GRun menu.

clacaputo · 2022-04-01T09:53:12Z

@cmsbuild please test

cmsbuild · 2022-04-01T13:48:21Z

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-60bbc1/23596/summary.html
COMMIT: 03057b3
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-31-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/37286/23596/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

No significant changes to the logs found
Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3593039
DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3593009
DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
Checked 200 log files, 45 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
TriggerResults: no differences found

missirol · 2022-04-02T20:49:20Z

urgent

According to #37286 (comment), the plan of MUO-HLT experts is to have this PR (integrated in master and) backported in time for 12_3_0.

("urgent" here means "to be backported in time for 12_3_0")

clacaputo · 2022-04-04T14:27:19Z

+reconstruction

cmsbuild · 2022-04-04T14:27:43Z

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

qliphy · 2022-04-05T01:08:52Z

+1

khaosmos93 added 2 commits March 21, 2022 10:44

pt dependent ROI producers

3aff55f

code-checks & code-format

f2bf00c

cmsbuild added this to the CMSSW_12_4_X milestone Mar 21, 2022

cmsbuild added code-checks-pending orp-pending pending-signatures reconstruction-pending tests-pending labels Mar 21, 2022

cmsbuild added code-checks-approved and removed code-checks-pending labels Mar 21, 2022

mmusich reviewed Mar 22, 2022

View reviewed changes

clacaputo reviewed Mar 23, 2022

View reviewed changes

cmsbuild added tests-started and removed tests-pending labels Mar 25, 2022

cmsbuild added tests-approved and removed tests-started labels Mar 25, 2022

address comments

03057b3

cmsbuild added code-checks-pending tests-pending and removed tests-approved code-checks-approved labels Mar 31, 2022

cmsbuild added code-checks-approved and removed code-checks-pending labels Mar 31, 2022

cmsbuild added tests-started and removed tests-pending labels Apr 1, 2022

cmsbuild added tests-approved and removed tests-started labels Apr 1, 2022

cmsbuild added the urgent label Apr 2, 2022

cmsbuild added fully-signed reconstruction-approved and removed reconstruction-pending pending-signatures labels Apr 4, 2022

cmsbuild added orp-approved and removed orp-pending labels Apr 5, 2022

cmsbuild merged commit acc0b58 into cms-sw:master Apr 5, 2022

khaosmos93 mentioned this pull request Apr 5, 2022

[Backport 123X] pT dependent ROI producers for Muon HLT #37458

Merged

	void MuonTrackingRegionBuilder::fillDescriptions(edm::ConfigurationDescriptions& descriptions) {
	{
	edm::ParameterSetDescription desc;
	fillDescriptionsOffline(desc);
	descriptions.add("MuonTrackingRegionBuilder", desc);
	}
	{
	edm::ParameterSetDescription desc;
	fillDescriptionsHLT(desc);
	descriptions.add("MuonTrackingRegionBuilderHLT", desc);
	}
	descriptions.setComment(
	"Build a TrackingRegion around a standalone muon. Options to define region around beamspot or primary vertex and "
	"dynamic regions are included.");
	}
	void MuonTrackingRegionBuilder::fillDescriptionsHLT(edm::ParameterSetDescription& desc) {
	desc.add<double>("EtaR_UpperLimit_Par1", 0.25);
	desc.add<double>("DeltaR", 0.2);
	desc.add<edm::InputTag>("beamSpot", edm::InputTag("hltOnlineBeamSpot"));
	desc.add<int>("OnDemand", -1);
	desc.add<edm::InputTag>("vertexCollection", edm::InputTag("pixelVertices"));
	desc.add<double>("Rescale_phi", 3.0);
	desc.add<bool>("Eta_fixed", false);
	desc.add<double>("Rescale_eta", 3.0);
	desc.add<double>("PhiR_UpperLimit_Par2", 0.2);
	desc.add<double>("Eta_min", 0.05);
	desc.add<bool>("Phi_fixed", false);
	desc.add<double>("Phi_min", 0.05);
	desc.add<double>("PhiR_UpperLimit_Par1", 0.6);
	desc.add<double>("EtaR_UpperLimit_Par2", 0.15);
	desc.add<edm::InputTag>("MeasurementTrackerName", edm::InputTag("hltESPMeasurementTracker"));
	desc.add<bool>("UseVertex", false);
	desc.add<double>("Rescale_Dz", 3.0);
	desc.add<bool>("Pt_fixed", false);
	desc.add<bool>("Z_fixed", true);
	desc.add<double>("Pt_min", 1.5);
	desc.add<double>("DeltaZ", 15.9);
	desc.add<double>("DeltaEta", 0.2);
	desc.add<double>("DeltaPhi", 0.2);
	desc.add<int>("maxRegions", 1);
	desc.add<bool>("precise", true);
	desc.add<edm::InputTag>("input", edm::InputTag("hltL2Muons", "UpdatedAtVtx"));
	}

	void MuonTrackingRegionBuilder::fillDescriptionsOffline(edm::ParameterSetDescription& desc) {
	desc.add<double>("EtaR_UpperLimit_Par1", 0.25);
	desc.add<double>("DeltaR", 0.2);
	desc.add<edm::InputTag>("beamSpot", edm::InputTag(""));
	desc.add<int>("OnDemand", -1);
	desc.add<edm::InputTag>("vertexCollection", edm::InputTag(""));
	desc.add<double>("Rescale_phi", 3.0);
	desc.add<bool>("Eta_fixed", false);
	desc.add<double>("Rescale_eta", 3.0);
	desc.add<double>("PhiR_UpperLimit_Par2", 0.2);
	desc.add<double>("Eta_min", 0.05);
	desc.add<bool>("Phi_fixed", false);
	desc.add<double>("Phi_min", 0.05);
	desc.add<double>("PhiR_UpperLimit_Par1", 0.6);
	desc.add<double>("EtaR_UpperLimit_Par2", 0.15);
	desc.add<edm::InputTag>("MeasurementTrackerName", edm::InputTag(""));
	desc.add<bool>("UseVertex", false);
	desc.add<double>("Rescale_Dz", 3.0);
	desc.add<bool>("Pt_fixed", false);
	desc.add<bool>("Z_fixed", true);
	desc.add<double>("Pt_min", 1.5);
	desc.add<double>("DeltaZ", 15.9);
	desc.add<double>("DeltaEta", 0.2);
	desc.add<double>("DeltaPhi", 0.2);
	desc.add<int>("maxRegions", 1);
	desc.add<bool>("precise", true);
	desc.add<edm::InputTag>("input", edm::InputTag(""));
	}

		@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
		#ifndef RecoMuon_TrackingTools_MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder_H

	#ifndef RecoMuon_TrackingTools_MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder_H
	#ifndef RecoMuon_GlobalTrackingTools_MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder_h

		@@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
		#ifndef L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer_h

	#ifndef L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer_h
	#ifndef RecoTracker_TkTrackingRegions_L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer_h

		@@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
		#ifndef L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer_h
		#define L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer_h

	#define L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer_h
	#define RecoTracker_TkTrackingRegions_L1MuonSeededTrackingRegionsProducer_h

		@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
		#ifndef RecoMuon_TrackingTools_MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder_H
		#define RecoMuon_TrackingTools_MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder_H

	#define RecoMuon_TrackingTools_MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder_H
	#define RecoMuon_GlobalTrackingTools_MuonTrackingRegionByPtBuilder_h

pT dependent ROI producers for Muon HLT #37286

pT dependent ROI producers for Muon HLT #37286

Conversation

khaosmos93 commented Mar 21, 2022

cmsbuild commented Mar 21, 2022

cmsbuild commented Mar 21, 2022

missirol commented Mar 21, 2022

JanFSchulte commented Mar 21, 2022

missirol commented Mar 21, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

clacaputo commented Mar 23, 2022

clacaputo commented Mar 25, 2022

JanFSchulte commented Mar 25, 2022

cmsbuild commented Mar 25, 2022

Comparison Summary

cmsbuild commented Mar 31, 2022

cmsbuild commented Mar 31, 2022

khaosmos93 commented Mar 31, 2022

clacaputo commented Apr 1, 2022

cmsbuild commented Apr 1, 2022

Comparison Summary

missirol commented Apr 2, 2022 • edited

clacaputo commented Apr 4, 2022

cmsbuild commented Apr 4, 2022

qliphy commented Apr 5, 2022

missirol commented Apr 2, 2022 •

edited