New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
L1 phase-2 calo developments #37401
L1 phase-2 calo developments #37401
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37401/29065
|
A new Pull Request was created by @cecilecaillol for master. It involves the following packages:
@rekovic, @epalencia, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @cecilecaillol can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test test-das-selected-lumis had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-61c0e0/23518/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+l1 |
@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ | |||
hfSF = cms.double(1.0), | |||
debug = cms.bool(False), | |||
skipCalibrations = cms.bool(False), | |||
l1CaloTowers = cms.InputTag("L1EGammaClusterEmuProducer",), | |||
#l1CaloTowers = cms.InputTag("L1EGammaClusterEmuProducer",), | |||
#l1CaloTowers = cms.VInputTag(cms.InputTag("L1EGammaClusterEmuProducer","L1CaloTowerCollection","")), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we really need these? I mean: it's useful because a switch between the two may be done in the future? If not I would remove them.
@cecilecaillol it seems there are some conflicts to be solved. Excluding that and a very minor comment it is good to go for me. A general question about these L1 PRs to fill for my ignorance: there's no way (a wf) to test these changes in the release, is it? |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37401/29248
|
Pull request #37401 was updated. @rekovic, @epalencia, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @cecilecaillol can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-61c0e0/23832/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Thank you @EmyrClement and @cecilecaillol: all eta ranges seem to be mapped now |
+l1 |
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This is another PR to port all L1T Phase-2 developments to cms-sw. This PR targets the calorimeter code. It includes several PRs made locally, the details of which can be found in the twiki https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/SWGuideL1TPhase2Instructions and in the cms-l1t-offline branch.