New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
minor changes to SiPixelLorentzAnglePCL modules #37455
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37455/29149
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @malbouis, @tvami, @yuanchao, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-59d63d/23640/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+alca
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@mmusich do you think a 12_3_X backport would be useful? There are still some days before 12_3_0 is built and deployed in Tier0. |
sure, will do. |
here it is: #37459 |
@mmusich @francescobrivio there are quite a lot differences in the DQM outputs of wf 1001, see a few examples below: Are they justified by the changes applied in this PR? |
Yes.
Because 1001.0 is the only wf that runs PCL in the short matrix ( as stale as the input data might be) |
+1 |
PR description:
The goal of this PR is to introduce few minor improvements to the SiPixelLorentzAnglePCL modules:
h_drift_depth_adc_slice_
after computation is done;PR validation:
Private tests to be completed.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
N/A
cc:
@wweiphy