Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

minor changes to SiPixelLorentzAnglePCL modules #37455

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 5, 2022

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Apr 4, 2022

PR description:

The goal of this PR is to introduce few minor improvements to the SiPixelLorentzAnglePCL modules:

  • loosen the cluster size cut on BPix L2 from 4 to 3, as per presentation at AlCa/DB meeting Mar 28th;
  • zero the errors in several per sector monitor elements (to ease comparison using DQM GUI);
  • avoid bounds checks in array access to speed-up computations;
  • shorten per-sector bin names;
  • reset ME h_drift_depth_adc_slice_ after computation is done;

PR validation:

Private tests to be completed.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

N/A

cc:
@wweiphy

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 4, 2022

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37455/29149

  • This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 4, 2022

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • CalibTracker/SiPixelLorentzAngle (alca)

@cmsbuild, @malbouis, @tvami, @yuanchao, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@tocheng, @OzAmram, @ferencek, @mmusich, @dkotlins, @tvami this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Apr 4, 2022

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 4, 2022

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-59d63d/23640/summary.html
COMMIT: 51c495b
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-04-04-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/37455/23640/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3593039
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 46
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3592970
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 200 log files, 45 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@mmusich mmusich marked this pull request as ready for review April 4, 2022 19:24
@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor

+alca

  • PR in line with description
  • differences in the testes are only in the SiPixelLorentzAngle wf as expected

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 5, 2022

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich do you think a 12_3_X backport would be useful? There are still some days before 12_3_0 is built and deployed in Tier0.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Apr 5, 2022

do you think a 12_3_X backport would be useful?

sure, will do.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Apr 5, 2022

here it is: #37459

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Apr 5, 2022

@mmusich @francescobrivio there are quite a lot differences in the DQM outputs of wf 1001, see a few examples below:

image
image

Are they justified by the changes applied in this PR?
Why only in that PR, and not for example in 138.5 for Run3?

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Apr 5, 2022

Are they justified by the changes applied in this PR?

Yes.

Why only in that PR, and not for example in 138.5 for Run3?

Because 1001.0 is the only wf that runs PCL in the short matrix ( as stale as the input data might be)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Apr 5, 2022

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 8827930 into cms-sw:master Apr 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants