New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Phase2-gex127M Make some protection in accessing inpu collections for MTD so that some FasTsim tests can proceed #37517
Conversation
…me FasTsim tests can proceed
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37517/29232
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
@cmsbuild Please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37517/29233
|
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master. It involves the following packages:
@civanch, @clacaputo, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @mdhildreth, @slava77, @jpata can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f14473/23807/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
Can you provide some details on the changes to the log verbosity in production? Or do I understand correctly that since it would have resulted in a crash, this code is not running in any default production? |
For regular workflows in production or standard relval's, we do not come across these warnings. We get stuck when we try to develop FastSim workflows for Phase2 scenario. Once the workflows are fully developed, we would not get these mising collections. |
To my knowledge there was never work on Fastsim on MTD side, the code was always supposed to work for Fullsim, as it does already. Anyway the additional protection is clearly welcome, although on regular Fastsim should not change anything. |
+reconstruction
|
+Upgrade This is a technical PR to add the protection of missing collections. The aim is for Phase-2 FastSim dev. There is no change expected for existing FullSim workflow. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Make some protection in accessing inpu collections for MTD so that some FasTsim tests can proceed
PR validation:
Use the runTheMatrix test workflows
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Nothing special