Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add wfs with HLT as separate step (refactor) #37633

Merged
merged 8 commits into from Apr 22, 2022

Conversation

kskovpen
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Introduce an additional Run 3 wf where the HLT step is separated out from DIGI, following the studies mentioned in #37564

PR validation:

Tested on the newly created 11634.601.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Not a backport.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37633/29417

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @kskovpen for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @kpedro88, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @fabiocos, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@kskovpen
Copy link
Contributor Author

test parameters:

  • workflow = 11634.601

@kskovpen
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test


upgradeStepDict['HLTRun3'][k] = {'-s':'HLT:%s'%(hltversion),
'--conditions':gt,
'--datatier':'GEN-SIM-DIGI-RAW',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This datatier may cause the issue if workflow runs with stepchain, I think. It used to be an issue that stepchain can't handle same datatiers.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about referencing it as SIM-RAW?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0ecb09/24066/summary.html
COMMIT: bf7c19a
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-04-20-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/37633/24066/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /pool/condor/dir_16160/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-0ecb09/39434.75_TTbar_14TeV+2026D88_HLT75e33+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HLT75e33+HARVESTGlobal

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3695434
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3695404
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.004 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 205 log files, 45 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

test parameters:

  • workflows = 11634.601
  • relvals_opt = --what upgrade,standard,highstats,pileup,generator,extendedgen,production,ged,machine,premix

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

If the workflow is expected to run every IB, the workflow should be added to relval2017.

@kskovpen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks a lot @srimanob and @makortel for your comments.
I would propose to keep this wf at 11634.601. It has not been tested in the production system yet, so let's have it for tests for now and in the meantime we can run some tests in production in order to see if any problem appears (such as the possible data tier adjustment, as mentioned by @srimanob). Once it is fully tested, we can put it in ProdLike. The description has been added in README, as suggested.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #37633 was updated. @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please check and sign again.

@kskovpen
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0ecb09/24121/summary.html
COMMIT: d579a07
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-04-21-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/37633/24121/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-0ecb09/11634.601_TTbar_14TeV+2021_DigiNoHLT+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSim+Digi+HLTRun3+RecoNano+HARVESTNano
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-0ecb09/39434.75_TTbar_14TeV+2026D88_HLT75e33+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HLT75e33+HARVESTGlobal

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3695434
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3695404
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 205 log files, 45 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

The workflow 1634.601 run as expected.

@kskovpen
Copy link
Contributor Author

+pdmv

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants