New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add wfs with HLT as separate step (refactor) #37633
Conversation
update master
update master
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37633/29417
|
A new Pull Request was created by @kskovpen for master. It involves the following packages:
@jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
test parameters:
|
please test |
|
||
upgradeStepDict['HLTRun3'][k] = {'-s':'HLT:%s'%(hltversion), | ||
'--conditions':gt, | ||
'--datatier':'GEN-SIM-DIGI-RAW', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This datatier may cause the issue if workflow runs with stepchain, I think. It used to be an issue that stepchain can't handle same datatiers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about referencing it as SIM-RAW?
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0ecb09/24066/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild please test |
If the workflow is expected to run every IB, the workflow should be added to |
Thanks a lot @srimanob and @makortel for your comments. |
Pull request #37633 was updated. @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0ecb09/24121/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+Upgrade The workflow |
+pdmv |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Introduce an additional Run 3 wf where the HLT step is separated out from DIGI, following the studies mentioned in #37564
PR validation:
Tested on the newly created 11634.601.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Not a backport.