New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Phase2-hgx312 Add dd4hep version of DDHGCalSiliconRotatedModule and add the v17 version full silicon layers of HE part of HGCal #37897
Conversation
…sion full silicon layers of HE part of HGCal
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37897/29907
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
@cmsbuild Please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37897/29909
|
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master. It involves the following packages:
@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-fbf5df/24600/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37897/29959
|
Pull request #37897 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild Please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-fbf5df/24641/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
1 similar comment
+Upgrade |
@cvuosalo could you sign this for pre4 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
std::vector<double> slopeT_; // Slopes at the larger R | ||
std::vector<double> zFrontT_; // Starting Z values for the slopes | ||
std::vector<double> rMaxFront_; // Corresponding rMax's | ||
std::vector<int> layerTypes_; // Layer type (Centering, rotations..) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since it is not obvious to me to understand it from the code: are really layerTipe_
and layerTypes_
different?
Any less ambiguous name for (at least) one of the two could not be invented?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They are indeed different - one rferes to all the layers and the other to the layer containing the wafer as described in the lfat file. May be we shall change one of the names in the next revision. Please merge this PR as it is.
+1 |
PR description:
Add dd4hep version of DDHGCalSiliconRotatedModule and add the v17 version full silicon layers of HE part of HGCal
PR validation:
Use the cfg's in Geometry/HGCalCommonData/test/python
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Nothing special