New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changing FFTJet modules to stream modules #37999
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37999/30077
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37999/30079
|
A new Pull Request was created by @igv4321 (Igor Volobouev) for master. It involves the following packages:
@jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-db8ee5/24829/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@igv4321 thanks for this. For my understanding, do the FFTJet modules run in any matrix workflow? Or what's their use case currently? |
FFTJet modules do not run in any matrix workflow. The code is currently dormant. I hope to get a student to work on multiresolution jet reconstruction, then we will start using it again. |
+reconstruction
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Changed all FFTJet modules to stream modules. This is just a technical fix, no change is expected for any outputs.
PR validation:
runTheMatrix was run as well as some private checks.