Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[12.4.X] Shorten the names of two ALCARECOStreams in order to fit into DBS database schema limitations #38187

Merged

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Jun 1, 2022

backport of #38186

PR description:

It was pointed out in https://cms-talk.web.cern.ch/t/alcaprompt-datasets-not-loaded-in-dbs/11146/1 that, quoting:

Since the last update of the alcareco matrix, two new producers were added to ExpressPhysics:

  • PromptCalibProdSiPixelLorentzAngle
  • PromptCalibProdSiStripHitEfficiency
    while the resulting (harvested) ROOT files are regularly displayed in the DQM, the corresponding ALCAPROMPT datasets in DAS are missing.

The names of the datasets expected are:

/StreamExpress/Run2022A-PromptCalibProdSiStripHitEfficiency-Express-v1/ALCAPROMPT
/StreamExpress/Run2022A-PromptCalibProdSiPixelLorentzAngle-Express-v1/ALCAPROMPT

According to Tier0 experts the problem is related to the name of the dataset, which is too long to be accepted, and the WMAgent software at present is not signalling this but keeps trying the upload. While probably a better handling of this issue should be thought for future, we need to fix the cause of the problem by shortening the names.

This PR performs such shortening:

  • ALCARECOPromptCalibProdSiPixelLorentzAngle is renamed ALCARECOPromptCalibProdSiPixelLA
  • ALCARECOStreamPromptCalibProdSiStripHitEfficiency is renamed ALCARECOStreamPromptCalibProdSiStripHitEff

PR validation:

Run the following commands:

cmsDriver.py testReAlCa -s ALCA:PromptCalibProdSiPixelLA --conditions 123X_dataRun3_Express_v6 --scenario pp --data --era Run2_2018 --datatier ALCARECO --eventcontent ALCARECO --processName=ReAlCa -n 10000 --dasquery='file dataset=/StreamExpress/Run2022A-SiPixelCalSingleMuon-Express-v1/ALCARECO run=352572' --customise_commands='process.ALCARECOCalSignleMuonFilterForSiPixelLorentzAngle.TriggerResultsTag = cms.InputTag ( "TriggerResults","","HLT" ) ; process.ALCARECOCalSignleMuonFilterForSiPixelLorentzAngle.HLTPaths = ["*"]' --nThreads=4

cmsDriver.py stepHarvest -s ALCAHARVEST:SiPixelLA --conditions 123X_dataRun3_Express_v6  --scenario pp --data --era Run2_2018 --filein file:PromptCalibProdSiPixelLA.root -n -1

and

cmsDriver.py testReAlCa -s ALCA:PromptCalibProdSiStripHitEff --conditions 123X_dataRun2_v2 --scenario pp --data --era Run2_2018 --datatier ALCARECO --eventcontent ALCARECO --processName=ReAlCa -n 100000 --dasquery='file dataset=/StreamExpress/Run2018D-SiStripCalMinBias-Express-v1/ALCARECO run=325172' --nThreads=4

msDriver.py stepHarvest -s ALCAHARVEST:SiStripHitEff --conditions 123X_dataRun2_v2 --scenario pp --data --era Run2_2018 --filein file:PromptCalibProdSiStripHitEff.root -n -1 

Also exercised successfully the two runTheMatrix workflows running the PCL workflows:

  • runTheMatrix.py -l 1001,1001.2

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Verbatim backport of #38186

…treamPromptCalibProdSiStripHitEff and ALCARECOStreamPromptCalibProdSiPixelLorentzAngle -> ALCARECOStreamPromptCalibProdSiPixelLA
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2022

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_12_4_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • Calibration/TkAlCaRecoProducers (alca)
  • Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)
  • Configuration/StandardSequences (operations)

@perrotta, @malbouis, @yuanchao, @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @tvami, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @qliphy, @francescobrivio, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mtosi, @beaucero, @fabiocos, @makortel, @felicepantaleo, @slomeo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @ebrondol, @tocheng, @lecriste, @trtomei, @mmusich, @threus, @dgulhan, @kpedro88 this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Jun 2, 2022

test parameters:

  • workflow = 1001.2

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Jun 2, 2022

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 2, 2022

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3fbeb8/25189/summary.html
COMMIT: 0b894a9
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-06-01-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38187/25189/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-3fbeb8/1001.2_RunZeroBias2017F+RunZeroBias2017F+TIER0EXPRUN2+ALCAEXPRUN2+ALCAHARVDSIPIXELCAL+ALCAHARVDSIPIXELCALLA

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3670175
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 13
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3670139
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.004 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 213 log files, 45 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 2, 2022

Pull request #38187 was updated. @perrotta, @malbouis, @yuanchao, @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @tvami, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @qliphy, @francescobrivio, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Jun 2, 2022

@cmsbuild, please test

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Jun 2, 2022

the unit test failure is unrelated.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 2, 2022

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3fbeb8/25201/summary.html
COMMIT: fd82c9f
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-06-02-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38187/25201/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Unit Tests

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test test-das-selected-lumis had ERRORS

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-3fbeb8/1001.2_RunZeroBias2017F+RunZeroBias2017F+TIER0EXPRUN2+ALCAEXPRUN2+ALCAHARVDSIPIXELCAL+ALCAHARVDSIPIXELCALLA

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3670175
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3670151
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • Checked 213 log files, 45 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jun 2, 2022

+alca

  • unit test failure is not connected

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Jun 2, 2022

+Upgrade

Backport PR.

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Jun 2, 2022

@cmsbuild please test

Just to clean up the failure.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 2, 2022

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3fbeb8/25222/summary.html
COMMIT: fd82c9f
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-06-02-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38187/25222/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-3fbeb8/1001.2_RunZeroBias2017F+RunZeroBias2017F+TIER0EXPRUN2+ALCAEXPRUN2+ALCAHARVDSIPIXELCAL+ALCAHARVDSIPIXELCALLA

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3670175
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3670145
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • Checked 213 log files, 45 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@kskovpen
Copy link
Contributor

kskovpen commented Jun 3, 2022

+pdmv

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor

@cms-sw/orp-l2 this is basically fully signed as well!

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Jun 5, 2022

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 5, 2022

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_5_X is complete. This pull request will be automatically merged.

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 086b9ae into cms-sw:CMSSW_12_4_X Jun 5, 2022
@mmusich mmusich deleted the renameLongAlCaStreamName_12_4_X branch June 5, 2022 12:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants