Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[EGM MVA ID] xml.gz to root conversion for photons #38556

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 14, 2022

Conversation

swagata87
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This is a follow up of #38339, which addressed xml to root conversion of electron MVA IDs, while this PR does the same for photon MVA ID. This is motivated by the noticeable improvement reported in #38339. Since the number of photon xml files are much smaller than electron, it could very well be that the improvement brought in by this PR won't be as noticeable. But I'm curious to see the effect of this PR, taking advantage of the profiling options of the bot. If the improvement is negligible, then.. oh well.

PR validation:

Tested with workflow 11834.21.

This PR is not a backport.
Backport not necessary.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38556/30794

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@swagata87
Copy link
Contributor Author

enable profiling

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @swagata87 (Swagata Mukherjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoEgamma/PhotonIdentification (reconstruction)

@jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Sam-Harper, @jainshilpi, @valsdav, @lgray, @sobhatta, @afiqaize, @wrtabb, @varuns23, @ram1123 this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@swagata87
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test with cms-data/RecoEgamma-PhotonIdentification#12

@swagata87
Copy link
Contributor Author

type egamma

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2c023c/25888/summary.html
COMMIT: 12907c9
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-06-29-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
Additional Tests: PROFILING
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38556/25888/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2c023c/25888/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2c023c/25888/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3654586
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3654556
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 49 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 208 log files, 45 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @swagata87 , I'm not sure what to check in the profiling but if I considered edm::WorkerMaker<MVAValueMapProducer<reco::Photon> >::makeModule(edm::ParameterSet const&) const, I see CPU timing reduction after this PR.

12_5_0_pre3: 2.6 % ----> this PR: 2.37 %

@swagata87
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @clacaputo, thanks for checking.
I had tried to check this myself, but I was a bit lost in many folders that are produced by the PR test.
Anyways good to see some timing improvement coming from this PR, although the impact is smaller than the electron case (#38339 (comment)), as expected.

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

+reconstruction

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Jul 14, 2022

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 3635572 into cms-sw:master Jul 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants