Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip PPS diamond calibration if there are no parameters #38763

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 18, 2022

Conversation

ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

There was a possibility of crash in:

ch_t_twc = calib_fct_->evaluate(std::vector<double>{tot}, ch_params);

if the calibration was not produced for a given channel. This fix adds the condition to handle this scenario.

PR validation:

Can be validated with relval 1041

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

This PR should be backported to the 12_4_X

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38763/31090

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@ChrisMisan ChrisMisan changed the title Skip calibration if there are no parameters Skip PPS diamond calibration if there are no parameters Jul 15, 2022
@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor Author

type bug-fix, ctpps

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38763/31091

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @ChrisMisan (Christopher) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoPPS/Local (reconstruction)

@jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@forthommel, @grzanka this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor Author

urgent

  • backport is urgent

@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor Author

test parameters:

workflow = 1041

@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b5b4d2/26276/summary.html
COMMIT: 2e660e1
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-07-15-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38763/26276/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-b5b4d2/1041.0_RunExpressPhy2017F+RunExpressPhy2017F+TIER0EXPPPSCAL+ALCASPLITPPSCAL+ALCAHARVDPPSCAL

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3654341
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3654311
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • Checked 212 log files, 45 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

+reconstruction

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants