Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[12_4_X] Add default calibration product to PPS TDC PCL #38771

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 18, 2022

Conversation

ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

There was a possibility of crash in:

ch_t_twc = calib_fct_->evaluate(std::vector<double>{tot}, ch_params);

if the calibration was not produced for a given channel. This fix adds the default 0 calibration product to the PCL.

PR validation:

Can be validated with relval 1041

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Backport of #38770

@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor Author

type ctpps, bug-fix

@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor Author

ChrisMisan commented Jul 17, 2022

urgent

  • backport is urgent

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 17, 2022

A new Pull Request was created by @ChrisMisan (Christopher) for CMSSW_12_4_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • CalibPPS/TimingCalibration (alca)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@fabferro, @mmusich, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor Author

backport of #38770

@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor Author

test parameters:
workflow = 1041

@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f65386/26292/summary.html
COMMIT: 51a3b57
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-07-17-0000/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/38771/26292/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-f65386/1041.0_RunExpressPhy2017F+RunExpressPhy2017F+TIER0EXPPPSCAL+ALCASPLITPPSCAL+ALCAHARVDPPSCAL

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3676486
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3676456
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.004 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 212 log files, 45 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jul 18, 2022

+alca

  • the master PR is in the IBs and works fine

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_5_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Jul 18, 2022

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 534c08e into cms-sw:CMSSW_12_4_X Jul 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants