Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added timestamps to externalGenerator output #38857

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 27, 2022

Conversation

Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Adding timestamps to the external program being run may make it easier to understand cases where there is a timeout between cmsRun and the program.

PR validation:

Code compiles and unit tests pass.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38857/31265

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • GeneratorInterface/Core (generators)

@SiewYan, @mkirsano, @Saptaparna, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @alberto-sanchez can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@alberto-sanchez, @mkirsano this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6683b3/26449/summary.html
COMMIT: 6489059
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-07-25-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38857/26449/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals-INPUT

  • 140.57140.57_RunHI2018Reduced+RunHI2018Reduced+RECOHID18+HARVESTDHI18/step2_RunHI2018Reduced+RunHI2018Reduced+RECOHID18+HARVESTDHI18.log

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3667670
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3667640
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • Checked 210 log files, 47 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor Author

The log file for the failed IB test is strange, it just ends after the tensorflow printout about optimizing vector instructions. There is nothing about a signal going off. Seems almost like the node went down or the output disk filled up so the log couldn't be added to.

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6683b3/26465/summary.html
COMMIT: 6489059
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-07-26-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38857/26465/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3667670
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 14
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3667634
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • Checked 210 log files, 47 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@SiewYan
Copy link
Contributor

SiewYan commented Jul 27, 2022

+1

@Dr15Jones , thanks for the PR, its looking good.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants