Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add GEM recHits and segments to AlCaRecos #38859

Conversation

hyunyong
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Add GEM recHits and segments in ALCARECOMuAlCalIsolatedMu, ALCARECOMuAlGlobalCosmics, and ALCARECOMuAlGlobalCosmicsInCollisions.

Need to backport to 12_4_X.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38859/31269

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @hyunyong for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Alignment/CommonAlignmentProducer (alca)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@pakhotin, @mmusich, @adewit, @tocheng, @tlampen this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jul 25, 2022

test parameters:

  • workflows = 1001.3,1002.3

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jul 25, 2022

@hyunyong you dont have the numbers on the size increase, do you?

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jul 25, 2022

@cmsbuild , please test

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jul 25, 2022

Please also modify the PR title

@hyunyong hyunyong changed the title Add gem to alcareco mu al cal isolated mu cmssw 12 5 x 2022 07 25 1100 pr Add GEM recHits and segments to AlCaRecos Jul 25, 2022
@hyunyong
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hyunyong you dont have the numbers on the size increase, do you?

No, I don't know but I will ask it at the GEM DPG meeting tomorrow.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-654334/26453/summary.html
COMMIT: 31274fd
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-07-25-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38859/26453/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-654334/1001.3_RunSingleMuon2022B+RunSingleMuon2022B+TIER0EXPRUN3+ALCAEXPRUN3+ALCAHARVDEXPRUN3
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-654334/1002.3_RunZeroBias2022B+RunZeroBias2022B+TIER0PROMPTRUN3+ALCASPLITRUN3+ALCAHARVDEXPRUN3

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 53
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3697418
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3697394
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 52 files compared)
  • Checked 218 log files, 47 edm output root files, 53 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38859/31281

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #38859 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please check and sign again.

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jul 26, 2022

@cmsbuild , please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-654334/26471/summary.html
COMMIT: d071d1f
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-07-26-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38859/26471/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-654334/1001.3_RunSingleMuon2022B+RunSingleMuon2022B+TIER0EXPRUN3+ALCAEXPRUN3+ALCAHARVDEXPRUN3
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-654334/1002.3_RunZeroBias2022B+RunZeroBias2022B+TIER0PROMPTRUN3+ALCASPLITRUN3+ALCAHARVDEXPRUN3

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 53
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3697418
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 14
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3697382
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 52 files compared)
  • Checked 218 log files, 47 edm output root files, 53 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@hyunyong
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have checked the output and the MuAlCalIsolated skim contains GEM recHits and segments now.

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jul 27, 2022

That's great, can we please have a the numbers for the increase of size before merging the PR?

@hyunyong
Copy link
Contributor Author

That's great, can we please have a the numbers for the increase of size before merging the PR?

Yes, I processed 1,000 events and the size difference is 77894 bytes. So, average size of GEM recHits and segments is 78 bytes/event.

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jul 27, 2022

So I believe that's a 2% increase, for an ALCARECO, that's probably fine. Ok, I'll sign it now, and please prepare the backport

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Jul 27, 2022

+alca

  • tests pass and produce the ALCARECO, which now contains the new collections
  • size increase is acceptable

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@hyunyong
Copy link
Contributor Author

So I believe that's a 2% increase, for an ALCARECO, that's probably fine. Ok, I'll sign it now, and please prepare the backport

Yes, I made the backport #38876

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Jul 28, 2022

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 6a5fde9 into cms-sw:master Jul 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants