New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Run3-gex138A Replace access by label with access using token in CalibCalorimetry/EcalPedestalOffsets #39186
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39186/31784
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39186/31785
|
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39186/31786
|
Pull request #39186 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild Please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5fedfb/27075/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+alca
|
Pull request #39186 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please check and sign again. |
…calPedestalOffsets Code check Take Andrea's comments Code check
@cmsbuild Please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39186/31821
|
Pull request #39186 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please check and sign again. |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals
|
The 13434 relval error is clearly unrelated ("no input files specified for secondary input source") |
@perrotta should I restart the test procedure? |
Not for me. The error message is clear, and it does not relate to this PR |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
merge |
PR description:
Replace access by label with access using token in CalibCalorimetry/EcalPedestalOffsets
PR validation:
Use the runTheMatrix test workflows
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Nothing special