Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

62X - fix metUncertaintyTools for scheduled processing #3931

Merged

Conversation

vadler
Copy link

@vadler vadler commented May 19, 2014

Backport of #3929

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @vadler (Volker Adler) for CMSSW_6_2_X.

62X - fix metUncertaintyTools for scheduled processing

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/PatUtils

@nclopezo, @vadler, @cmsbuild, @Degano, @monttj can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma, @nhanvtran this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@monttj
Copy link
Contributor

monttj commented May 19, 2014

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_6_2_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. @Degano can you please take care of it?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_6_2_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). @Degano can you please take care of it?

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2014
62X - fix `metUncertaintyTools` for scheduled processing
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit c150d51 into cms-sw:CMSSW_6_2_X May 26, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants