Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[124X] Fixed RP IDs in the PPS alignment harvester #39361

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 11, 2022

Conversation

MatiXOfficial
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

See #39358

PR validation:

See #39358

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Backport of #39358

Now the harvester saves an SQLite file containing long RP ids.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 9, 2022

A new Pull Request was created by @MatiXOfficial (Mateusz Kocot) for CMSSW_12_4_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • CalibPPS/AlignmentGlobal (alca)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@fabferro, @mmusich, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Sep 9, 2022

backport of #39358

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Sep 9, 2022

type bugfix,ctpps

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Sep 9, 2022

urgent

  • should go into the next 12_4_X

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added the urgent label Sep 9, 2022
@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Sep 9, 2022

test parameters:

  • workflows = 1042,1045

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Sep 9, 2022

@cmsbuild , please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 9, 2022

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-908c55/27452/summary.html
COMMIT: 98c69b6
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-09-09-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/39361/27452/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-908c55/1042.0_RunExpressPhy2017F+RunExpressPhy2017F+TIER0EXPPPSCALALIG+ALCASPLITPPSALIG+ALCAHARVDPPSALIG
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-908c55/1045.0_RunRawPPS2022B+RunRawPPS2022B+TIER0EXPPPSCALRUN3+ALCASPLITPPSALIGRUN3+ALCAHARVDPPSALIGRUN3

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 52
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3678080
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3678056
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 51 files compared)
  • Checked 216 log files, 45 edm output root files, 52 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor

+alca

  • backport-ok
  • tests pass
  • differences only in MTD

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_6_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 9a6f0a7 into cms-sw:CMSSW_12_4_X Sep 11, 2022
@MatiXOfficial MatiXOfficial deleted the fix_det_ids_124X branch September 12, 2022 08:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants