Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed unnecessary includes in CommonTools/ParticleFlow #39582

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 6, 2022

Conversation

Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Removed include and commented include of deprecated header.

PR validation:

Code compiles without CMS deprecation warnings.

Removed include and commented include of deprecated header.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2022

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39582/32370

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2022

A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • CommonTools/ParticleFlow (reconstruction)

@cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @jdolen, @ahinzmann, @missirol, @gkasieczka, @hatakeyamak this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2022

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-320694/27944/summary.html
COMMIT: 318a995
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-10-03-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/39582/27944/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals-INPUT

  • 10007.0DAS Error
  • 10008.0DAS Error
  • 10009.0DAS Error
Expand to see more relval errors ...
  • 10024.0
  • 10024.5
  • 10025.0
  • 10042.0
  • 10071.0
  • 10224.0
  • 10224.15
  • 10424.0
  • 10802.0
  • 10805.31
  • 10807.0
  • 10808.0
  • 10809.0
  • 10824.0
  • 10824.501
  • 10824.505
  • 10824.8
  • 10842.0
  • 10871.0
  • 11024.6
  • 11224.0

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-320694/41834.0_TTbar_14TeV+2026D94+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3432650
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3432622
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 204 log files, 49 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Oct 6, 2022

merge

  • removing unused and deprecated headers, even commented out, can be merged even without an explicit @cms-sw/reconstruction-l2 ,signature to clean up the long queue a bit
  • RelValInput errors are not related and should not retrigger new tests

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 7e2c346 into cms-sw:master Oct 6, 2022
@Dr15Jones Dr15Jones deleted the headerCommonToolsParticleFlow branch October 6, 2022 13:16
@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

jfernan2 commented Sep 18, 2023

+1
(for the records)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants