New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PPS automatic workflows for timing calibration #39652
Conversation
type ctpps, new-feature |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39652/32453
|
A new Pull Request was created by @ChrisMisan (Christopher) for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @yuanchao, @ChrisMisan, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @tvami, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @syuvivida, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
process.load('Configuration.EventContent.EventContent_cff') | ||
process.load('Configuration.StandardSequences.FrontierConditions_GlobalTag_cff') | ||
from Configuration.AlCa.GlobalTag import GlobalTag | ||
process.GlobalTag = GlobalTag(process.GlobalTag, '124X_dataRun3_Prompt_frozen_v4', '') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this should be the autoCond map, not a fixed GT
################ | ||
#geometry | ||
################ | ||
process.load('Geometry.VeryForwardGeometry.geometryRPFromDD_2021_cfi') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why isnt the geometry taken from DD4HEP?
process.load("DQMServices.Components.DQMEnvironment_cfi") | ||
process.dqmEnv.subSystemFolder = "CalibPPS" | ||
process.dqmSaver.convention = 'Offline' | ||
process.dqmSaver.workflow = "/CalibPPS/TimingCalibration/CMSSW_12_0_0_pre2" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CMSSW_12_0_0_pre2
?
hi @ChrisMisan I made a few comments in one file, but they apply to all of the configs. Should we also make these into a unit test? This wont be tested with the relval wf-s right? |
@tvami Thanks for the comments, I'll address them in the next commit. As for the unit test, I'm not sure. I can test if the script was executed successfully but it really doesn't give any useful information about the final outcome as it just submits jobs to crab. Do we have any mechanisms in place to test for crab jobs? |
Hi Chris, no I was just thinking about running
directly locally in a unit test, we for sure dont need to do anything with CRAB here |
Ah, ok, then I think it can be arranged, I'll take a look and add it into next commit. |
795db6b
to
c9493ec
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39652/32482
|
Pull request #39652 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @ChrisMisan, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @tvami, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @syuvivida, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
Pull request #39652 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @ChrisMisan, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @tvami, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @syuvivida, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild , please test |
error seems unrelated |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUT
Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
@cmsbuild , please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18a44d/28247/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+alca
|
@perrotta PR was updated, is it ok for you to sign it like this? |
Thank you @ChrisMisan for the updates that took care of the comments I had posted. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR adds a set of configuration files for offline calibration workflow described in:
https://indico.cern.ch/event/1200233/contributions/5049293/attachments/2511413/4316826/PPS%20Timing%20Calibration%20talk.pdf s.11
and:
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/CTPPSTimeCalibration
PR validation:
Those files are intended only for the offline use, details on how to run them are included in: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/CTPPSTimeCalibration
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
no backport is needed