Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[EGM HLT@Phase2] Move to TICL v4 #39820

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 24, 2022
Merged

Conversation

swagata87
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

TICL V4 was introduced by HGCAL DPG by this PR: #38880
However, Phase2 HLT still uses TICL v3.
This PR aims to make the TICL v3->v4 transition for e/gamma HLT in Phase2.
Note that other parts of Phase2 simplified HLT menu (like Jet paths etc) still use TICL v3, and those are not touched in this PR.

PR validation:

runTheMatrix.py -l 39434.75 ran fine.

Measured efficiency of HLT_Ele32 w.r.t gen electrons using this sample: /ZprimeToEE_M-6000_TuneCP5_14TeV-pythia8/PhaseIISpring22DRMiniAOD-PU200_123X_mcRun4_realistic_v11-v1/GEN-SIM-DIGI-RAW-MINIAOD. Made a comparison between TICL v3 and TICL v4. There is some improvement in v4, as seen in the plot, in HGCAL region.

Using the same sample, some showershape variables at HLT were checked. The small changes in shape look okay.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39820/32688

  • This PR adds an extra 36KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @swagata87 (Swagata Mukherjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • HLTrigger/Configuration (hlt)

@cmsbuild, @missirol, @Martin-Grunewald can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @silviodonato this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

Comment on lines -16 to -17
from ..modules.ticlTrackstersEMForEgamma_cfi import *
from ..modules.ticlTrackstersHADForEgamma_cfi import *
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can files like ticlTrackstersEMForEgamma_cfi be removed then?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

indeed, they are not being used anywhere.. so can be removed.
I'll clean it up then

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39820/32695

  • This PR adds an extra 36KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #39820 was updated. @cmsbuild, @missirol, @Martin-Grunewald can you please check and sign again.

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor

test parameters:

  • workflows = 20834.76
  • relvals_opt = --what cleanedupgrade,standard,highstats,pileup,generator,extendedgen,production,ged,machine,premix,nano

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a02e97/28436/summary.html
COMMIT: d1cef67
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-10-22-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/39820/28436/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-a02e97/20834.76_TTbar_14TeV+2026D88_HLTwDIGI75e33+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • Reco comparison had 6 failed jobs
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3471515
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3471487
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 205 log files, 48 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 2 / 47 workflows

@missirol
Copy link
Contributor

missirol commented Oct 23, 2022

+hlt

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants