[12_5_X] Add new HI Beamspot to the Run-3 HI MC and change vertex smearing to use the estimated HI version

[tvami]

PR description:

Please see #39758

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

backport of #39758

[tvami]

backport of #39758

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for CMSSW_12_5_X.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/AlCa (alca)
• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @bbilin, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @saumyaphor4252, @kskovpen, @sunilUIET, @tvami, @ChrisMisan, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @kpedro88, @fabiocos, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @tocheng, @trtomei, @mmusich, @beaucero, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from Add new HI Beamspot to the Run-3 HI MC + change vertex smearing to use the estimated HI version #39758

[tvami]

test parameters:

• workflows = 159, 159.02, 159.03

[tvami]

@cmsbuild , please test

[tvami]

urgent

• should be part of the next 12_5_X

[tvami]

Backport of #39758

[tvami]

Backport of #39758

this doesnt seem to be registered as a label :/

[francescobrivio]

backport of #39758

[francescobrivio]

Backport of #39758

this doesnt seem to be registered as a label :/

it's the capital "B" the issue :D

[tvami]

Hmm but look at this try: #39951 (comment)

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ccf212/28709/summary.html
COMMIT: 8bd4fe7
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-11-01-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/39951/28709/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-ccf212/159.02_HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2021_ppReco+HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2021_ppReco+DIGIHI2021PPRECO+RAWPRIMESIMHI18+RECOHI2021PPRECOMBAPPROXCLUSTERS+ALCARECOHI2021PPRECO+HARVESTHI2021PPRECO4
• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-ccf212/159.03_HydjetQ_MinBias_5020GeV_2021_ppReco+HydjetQ_MinBias_5020GeV_2021_ppReco+DIGIHI2021PPRECO+RAWPRIMESIMHI18+RECOHI2022PROD+MINIHI2022PROD

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 2014 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 53
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3931262
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 12253
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3918987
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 52 files compared)
• Checked 228 log files, 49 edm output root files, 53 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: found differences in 2 / 52 workflows

[francescobrivio]

+alca

• difference expected in the HI workflows
• DQM bin-by-bin comparison (https://tinyurl.com/27tznfkm) similar to master PR

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

[bbilin]

+pdmv

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_5_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_6_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[rappoccio]

+1