New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[NanoAOD V10] - Adding correct Iso filter name (without cut values) for Run3 #39956
[NanoAOD V10] - Adding correct Iso filter name (without cut values) for Run3 #39956
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39956/32885
|
A new Pull Request was created by @wonpoint4 (Won Jun) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @swertz, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test workflow nano Thanks a lot @wonpoint4 |
enable nano |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7d6d80/28734/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
+1 Only muon trigger objects in nanoV10 workflows change. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1
|
Original PR : #39230
Backport PR to 124X : #39894
PR Description:
There is inconsistency between the nanoV10 in 124X and frozen V10 config in master. This PR would make them consistent.