New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix gcc11
compilation issues in CompareAlignments
, post #38304 merge
#40019
fix gcc11
compilation issues in CompareAlignments
, post #38304 merge
#40019
Conversation
type bug-fix |
urgent
|
CompareAlignments
, post #38304 merge
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40019/32973
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test runtestRecoEgammaPhotonIdentification had ERRORS ---> test PVall had ERRORS ---> test DMRall had ERRORS RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ...RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ... |
|
CompareAlignments
, post #38304 mergegcc11
compilation issues in CompareAlignments
, post #38304 merge
@cmsbuild, please test
|
@smuzaffar the IB inputs are still failing due to this, do you think they will clear if we restart them? |
please test
|
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild, please test for CMSSW_12_6_X/el8_amd64_gcc11 |
In a local installation git cms-addpkg DQM/TrackerMonitorTrack
scramv1 b -j 20
voms-proxy-init -voms cms
edmPluginHelp -p MonitorTrackResiduals | head -1 yields:
then: runTheMatrix.py -l 4.22 --ibeos gives:
|
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals
|
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild, please test for CMSSW_12_6_X/el8_amd64_gcc11 |
@cms-sw/alca-l2 it is clear now that this PR solves the issues in compilation in gcc11 when all the dependent packages are compiled together. Please sign urgently. |
+alca
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@cms-sw/orp-l2 , if you merge this then I can force start a GCC11 IB |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e7e90e/28945/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 Fingers crossed this clears! :) |
Thanks @smuzaffar, please force build. |
The IBs seem to be happy now, thanks! |
PR description:
Minimal set of fixes, to avoid compilation issues with
Alignment/OfflineValidation
ingcc11
IBs, post #38304 merge (see IB logs )PR validation:
cmssw
compiles inel8_amd64_gcc11
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
N/A
@TomasKello, please cross-check