ECAL Phase 2 - Skip new ALCA step for Phase 2 ECAL development WFs

[thomreis]

PR description:

After the ALCA step was introduced for Phase 2 WFs with #39858 the ecalDevel workflows with suffix .61 and .612 failed during the new step5 since the track collections were not produced in the reco step. Since these WFs are intended for ECAL reconstruction developments, the reconstruction of other subdetector collections is not complete.

This PR skips the ALCA step for the ecalDevel WFs.

PR validation:

WF 20034.61 now runs to completion with four steps only.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40378/33496

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py modified in PR(s): Fix ClusterStorer for VectorHits #40363, Add run3 tracking low pu era #33532

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @thomreis (Thomas Reis) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@bbilin, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @sunilUIET can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @kpedro88, @fabiocos, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @trtomei, @beaucero, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[thomreis]

type ecal

[thomreis]

test parameters:

• workflow = 20034.61
• relvals_opt = --what cleanedupgrade

[thomreis]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1c591a/29727/summary.html
COMMIT: 415c936
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2022-12-20-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/40378/29727/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
20034.61 step 5
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 5 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3558162
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 154
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3557986
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
• Checked 215 log files, 165 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

Technical PR to disable ALCA step for special ECAL workflow.

[kskovpen]

+pdmv

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

+1