Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Phase2-hgx335C Extend testing of the V16/V17 geometry versions of HGCal #40573

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 21, 2023

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Extend testing of the V16/V17 geometry versions of HGCal. These tests are not expected to produce changes in any existing scenarios

PR validation:

Use these testing tools to make more elaborate tests of HGCal geometries (V17 and V16)

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Nothing special

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40573/33817

  • This PR adds an extra 44KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40573/33819

  • This PR adds an extra 44KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Geometry/HGCalCommonData (geometry, upgrade)
  • SimG4CMS/Calo (simulation)
  • Validation/HGCalValidation (dqm)

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @bsunanda, @makortel, @emanueleusai, @ianna, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @mdhildreth, @syuvivida, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@youyingli, @vandreev11, @fabiocos, @lecriste, @sethzenz, @missirol, @felicepantaleo, @rovere, @lgray, @cseez, @apsallid, @pfs, @thomreis, @hatakeyamak, @trtomei, @ebrondol, @beaucero, @slomeo, @simonepigazzini this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0414c7/30089/summary.html
COMMIT: 4d88e29
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-01-19-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/40573/30089/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3555479
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3555454
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 211 log files, 162 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Jan 20, 2023

+1

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@emanueleusai @srimanob Please approve this PR

@emanueleusai
Copy link
Member

+1

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants