New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Phase2-hgx335E Update the validity test of partial wafers of V16 geometry as well as the test kits #40585
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40585/33840
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40585/33842
|
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master. It involves the following packages:
@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @bsunanda, @makortel, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild Please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b09217/30116/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+geometry |
Hi @bsunanda |
@srimanob Since the validity test is modified for v16, we expect to see some changes in Phase2 scenarios |
+Upgrade Change in D88 is expected as mentioned in the PR description and #40585 (comment). Thx @bsunanda |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Update the validity test of partial wafers of V16 geometry as well as the test kits. Expect small changes in all scenarios using V16 geometry of HGCal or HFNose
PR validation:
Use the test scripts in Geometry/HGCalCommonData/test/python
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Nothing sp[ecial