Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix synchronization in ContextState test #40827

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 21, 2023

Conversation

makortel
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

@fwyzard mentioned the testHeterogeneousCoreCUDACore unit test was segfaulting on a specific Power9 machine after the ContextState test section in a way that hinted towards a problem in how TBB was being used. The existing code indeed could destruct the task_group while it was still being used in an task_arena::enqueue()'d task. This PR fixes the synchronization problem in the test.

PR validation:

The unit test runs on lxplus-gpu and on the Power9 machine @fwyzard had access to.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40827/34282

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • HeterogeneousCore/CUDACore (heterogeneous)

@cmsbuild, @makortel, @fwyzard can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@missirol, @rovere this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

enable gpu

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild, please test

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild, please test for el8_ppc64le_gcc11

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-084e80/30759/summary.html
COMMIT: 81a86dc
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_1_X_2023-02-20-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
Additional Tests: GPU
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/40827/30759/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 6 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3529029
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 9
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3528998
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 213 log files, 164 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

GPU Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 9 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 4
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 19862
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 251
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 19611
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 3 files compared)
  • Checked 12 log files, 9 edm output root files, 4 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 2 / 3 workflows

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-084e80/30760/summary.html
COMMIT: 81a86dc
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_1_X_2023-02-19-2300/el8_ppc64le_gcc11
Additional Tests: GPU
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/40827/30760/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

+heterogeneous

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants