Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added option to trigger on loose HMT showers in EMTF #41185

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Mar 27, 2023

Conversation

eyigitba
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Starting from 2023 we will trigger on loose showers in EMTF. This information will be used in uGMT to build the TwoLooseDiffSectorInTime trigger.

I also cleaned the configurable parameters nLooseShowers_, nNominalShowers_, and nTightShowers_. The number of showers is already indicated in the boolean name and these configurables don't really add any configuration options. i.e the condition for hasOneNominalInTime should always be one or more showers.

The data format changes were done in #40890 and uGMT logic update is done in #41042

PR validation:

Validated by producing ntuples which had expected amount of loose showers.

Also ran runTheMatrix.py -l limited -i all --ibeos with no failures.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

This PR will be backported to 13_0_X, but it depends also on the backport of #40890

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41185/34871

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @eyigitba for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • L1Trigger/L1TMuonEndCap (l1)

@epalencia, @cmsbuild, @cecilecaillol, @aloeliger can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@dinyar, @missirol, @JanFSchulte, @thomreis, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@aloeliger
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f11ca3/31591/summary.html
COMMIT: 22a87cd
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_1_X_2023-03-25-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/41185/31591/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 5 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 16 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3554286
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 12
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3554252
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 213 log files, 164 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@aloeliger
Copy link
Contributor

+l1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

Copy link
Contributor

@perrotta perrotta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very minor comments
@eyigitba @aloeliger please decide whether you think it is worth implementing them, or if you are really hurried up and want to merge right now. (In any case, applying the text fixes, rerunning the tests, and re-signing for L1 can take less than half a day: perhaps it cold be already merged in time for the 2300 IB, if you act quickly).

Comment on lines 12 to 14
enableTwoLooseShowers_ = pset.getParameter<bool>("enableTwoLooseShowers");
enableOneNominalShower_ = pset.getParameter<bool>("enableOneNominalShowers");
enableOneTightShower_ = pset.getParameter<bool>("enableOneTightShowers");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think these are the wrong name for these things now? Should be Shower?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, exactly. Apparently I missed these. I changed them now.

@aloeliger
Copy link
Contributor

Ahh, already got it by the time I said that.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41185/34893

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #41185 was updated. @epalencia, @cmsbuild, @cecilecaillol, @aloeliger can you please check and sign again.

@aloeliger
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f11ca3/31619/summary.html
COMMIT: 6a1fe23
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_1_X_2023-03-27-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/41185/31619/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 1 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 12 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3554286
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 9
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3554255
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 213 log files, 164 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@aloeliger
Copy link
Contributor

+l1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants