Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing iterations #4764

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Jul 29, 2014

Conversation

milosdjordjevic
Copy link
Contributor

Request to add the missing track iterations, the new iter7 and also the iter9 and iter10. This is a temporary fix in order not to ignore the tracks. More detailed studies on the performance of track quality cuts per iteration are coming soon.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @milosdjordjevic for CMSSW_7_2_X.

Add missing iterations

It involves the following packages:

RecoParticleFlow/Configuration
RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer
RecoParticleFlow/PFTracking

@nclopezo, @cmsbuild, @Degano, @StoyanStoynev, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@bachtis, @lgray this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1
Tested at: f4f191c
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
101.0 step1

runTheMatrix-results/101.0_SingleElectronE120EHCAL+SingleElectronE120EHCAL/step1_SingleElectronE120EHCAL+SingleElectronE120EHCAL.log

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4764/442/summary.html

@bachtis
Copy link
Contributor

bachtis commented Jul 23, 2014

The changed code has nothing to do with step1 ..... nor the files changed so this is irrelevant

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@milosdjordjevic
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have tested the runTheMatrix tool on a clean CMSSW_7_2_X_2014-07-23-1400 (without the proposed changes in my PR) and it fails to run the 101.0 step1 as well, so this could not be related to the PR.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@ktf
Copy link
Contributor

ktf commented Jul 24, 2014

Indeed 101.0 is a separate problem. Which should be fixed in next IB.

@bachtis
Copy link
Contributor

bachtis commented Jul 25, 2014

HI guys , will this be merged ? Cheers M

@ktf
Copy link
Contributor

ktf commented Jul 25, 2014

Whenever @slava77 or @StoyanStoynev look at it and sign off. Problem with IB solved since a while.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jul 28, 2014

testing now

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jul 29, 2014

+1

for #4764 f4f191c

tested with extended tests in CMSSW_7_2_X_2014-07-25-0200 (test area sign398)

Changes are generally small. The effects are most noticeable in the flat-pt qcd sample (matrix wflow 38.0):

  • addedMuonsAndHadrons count noticeable reduction [are these collections used for anything, btw? they are not monitored in DQM]
  • pfChMet noticeable reshuffling, no change in shape, no increase in tails; similar for pfMets
  • mu sumPfChargedHadronPt increases generally (looks like a bounce back up from the "iter7" PR temporary fix to avoid iter7 tracks being discarded #4662 ) neutralHadronEt goes down a bit. These are "muons" in jets.
    all_sign398vsorig_qcdflatpt15s3000wf38p0c_recomuons_muons__reco_obj_pfisolationr03_sumchargedhadronpt
    all_sign398vsorig_qcdflatpt15s3000wf38p0c_recomuons_muons__reco_obj_pfisolationr03_sumneutralhadronet

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_2_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine).

nclopezo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2014
RecoParticleFlow -- Add missing iterations
@nclopezo nclopezo merged commit 914b3e9 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_2_X Jul 29, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants