Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix forward port #5561

Merged
merged 11 commits into from Sep 25, 2014
Merged

Fix forward port #5561

merged 11 commits into from Sep 25, 2014

Conversation

ktf
Copy link
Contributor

@ktf ktf commented Sep 25, 2014

This is the rest of the forward port after ignoring Martin's request. After this 72X and 73X should be in sync.

@davidlange6 also this should be trivial. I think this new way of producing forward ports is much cleaner, the trick is to do a pull request for an already merged branch, not for the branch you want to merge.

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the Next CMSSW_7_3_X milestone Sep 25, 2014
ktf added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2014
@ktf ktf merged commit cd59ffe into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_3_X Sep 25, 2014
@ktf ktf deleted the fix-forward-port branch September 25, 2014 10:37
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @ktf (Giulio Eulisse) for CMSSW_7_3_X.

Fix forward port

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/SelectorUtils
Utilities/StaticAnalyzers

@nclopezo, @monttj, @cmsbuild, @Dr15Jones, @vadler, @ktf can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@wddgit this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo, @ktf you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants