HGC V5 Calibration weights

[lgray]

Use October 24th weights from @pfs for HGC V5 geometry.

@vandreev11 - this PR deprecates V4.

[mark-grimes]

Does there need to be a way to switch between V4 and V5, or are you happy to keep these for everything?

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @lgray (Lindsey Gray) for CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC.

HGC V5 Calibration weights

It involves the following packages:

RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterProducer

@cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @StoyanStoynev, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmarionncern, @bachtis this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@fratnikov, @mark-grimes you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[lgray]

@mark-grimes To my understanding the agreement was to simply stop using V4 from this update onwards.

[vandreev11]

@mark-grimes @lgray @pfs Yes, we go now with V5 as a baseline (TP) scenario.

[mark-grimes]

I thought there was a plan for relvals with V4 and V5 at least. @vandreev11?

[vandreev11]

@mark-grimes V5 relvals will be enough once the V5 calibrations will be in.

[vandreev11]

@mark-grimes I was too quick. V4 relvals will be still good to have as PandoraPFA does their own calibration staring from the RecHits.

[mark-grimes]

@vandreev11 but this pull request is fine for that?

[vandreev11]

@mark-grimes Yes, V5 calibration is applied to PFRecHits, does not disturb RecHits.

[mark-grimes]

merge

Tested and got some root errors which are unrelated, ignoring for now.