New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Configuring runthematrix for high PU relval (+fix priority for injection) #6159
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @boudoul (boudoul) for CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC. Configuring runthematrix for high PU relval (+fix priority for injection) It involves the following packages: Configuration/PyReleaseValidation @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @franzoni, @nclopezo, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
I'm preparing a fix of this PR (to fix the crash observed in the relvals submission) please keep this PR on hold while i'm testing the fixed version before comitting |
Hi @mark-grimes - I'm done with this PR no more commit forseeen for the next release |
merge |
Configuring runthematrix for high PU relval (+fix priority for injection)
This is an update to recyle GENSIM and submit PU relvals for SHCalNoTaper and Extended2023HGCal scenarios ,
This version of runthematrix has been used to submit :
https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/dataopsrequests/5862.html
https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/dataopsrequests/5863.html
The usual numbering is not changed, pu scenarios are added on top of the existing ones.
To test the PU sequence, the numbers ar 152xx for shashliknotaper and 150xx fo HGCAL (v5 version) -
Using the option -i all will use old gensim (recycling)
I also took the opportunity to change the priority of relvals (in MatrixInjector) to a value allowing more flexibility in prioritizing the relval WFs.