Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Configuring runthematrix for high PU relval (+fix priority for injection) #6159

Merged
merged 8 commits into from Nov 6, 2014

Conversation

boudoul
Copy link
Contributor

@boudoul boudoul commented Nov 2, 2014

This is an update to recyle GENSIM and submit PU relvals for SHCalNoTaper and Extended2023HGCal scenarios ,
This version of runthematrix has been used to submit :
https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/dataopsrequests/5862.html
https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/dataopsrequests/5863.html

The usual numbering is not changed, pu scenarios are added on top of the existing ones.
To test the PU sequence, the numbers ar 152xx for shashliknotaper and 150xx fo HGCAL (v5 version) -
Using the option -i all will use old gensim (recycling)

I also took the opportunity to change the priority of relvals (in MatrixInjector) to a value allowing more flexibility in prioritizing the relval WFs.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 2, 2014

A new Pull Request was created by @boudoul (boudoul) for CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC.

Configuring runthematrix for high PU relval (+fix priority for injection)

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @franzoni, @nclopezo, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@fratnikov, @mark-grimes you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@boudoul
Copy link
Contributor Author

boudoul commented Nov 3, 2014

I'm preparing a fix of this PR (to fix the crash observed in the relvals submission) please keep this PR on hold while i'm testing the fixed version before comitting

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 3, 2014

Pull request #6159 was updated. @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @franzoni, @nclopezo, @vlimant can you please check and sign again.

@boudoul
Copy link
Contributor Author

boudoul commented Nov 6, 2014

Hi @mark-grimes - I'm done with this PR no more commit forseeen for the next release

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 6, 2014

Pull request #6159 was updated. @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @franzoni, @nclopezo, @vlimant can you please check and sign again.

@fratnikov
Copy link

merge

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2014
Configuring runthematrix for high PU relval (+fix priority for injection)
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 8740f27 into cms-sw:CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC Nov 6, 2014
This was referenced Nov 15, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants