Update types of event/run/lumi in Jet/MET

[StoyanStoynev]

The online is changing to produce data with event numbers that are 64 bits instead of 32 bits. CMSSW software needs to be modified to handle that. Following
https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/recoDevelopment/1302.html
I am making changes to different packages, here JET/MET. I am using the events/run/lumi types defined in DataFormats/Provenance/interface/RunLumiEventNumber.h . There is an issue with fastjet that needs special treatment (not for this PR). Updates are generally trivial and there should be no any visible effects of them (except for the rare event numbers with > 32 bits).

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @StoyanStoynev for CMSSW_7_3_X.

Update types of event/run/lumi in Jet/MET

It involves the following packages:

RecoJets/FFTJetProducers
RecoJets/JetAnalyzers
RecoMET/METFilters

@nclopezo, @monttj, @cmsbuild, @StoyanStoynev, @slava77, @vadler can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@nhanvtran, @mmarionncern, @mariadalfonso, @TaiSakuma, @schoef this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo, @ktf you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[Dr15Jones]

Thanks!

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: c035cb4
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6205/645/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6205/645/summary.html

[vadler]

+1
Tested with CMSSW_7_3_X_2014-11-04-1400 and an updated RecoMET/METFilters/test/filters_cfg.py .

[StoyanStoynev]

+1
Tested d6192b1 on top of CMSSW_7_3_X_2014-11-04-0200 . I ran short matrix tests and there were no diffs in monitored quantities (none expected) - FWLite + DQM based comparisons. Jenkins show a few of the known false positives.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_3_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.