Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hydjet2 back port to CMSSW_7_1_X #6342

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 27, 2015
Merged

Hydjet2 back port to CMSSW_7_1_X #6342

merged 2 commits into from Jan 27, 2015

Conversation

wouf
Copy link
Contributor

@wouf wouf commented Nov 11, 2014

No description provided.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @wouf for CMSSW_7_1_X.

Hydjet2 back port to CMSSW_7_1_X

It involves the following packages:

GeneratorInterface/Hydjet2Interface

@vciulli, @covarell, @thuer, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @bendavid can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@wouf
Copy link
Contributor Author

wouf commented Nov 13, 2014

This is a new one PR for 71x

@covarell
Copy link
Contributor

Fine for us, but we remind that pythia6 (on which the generator is based) is no longer supported by the authors and support will decrease progressively in CMS too. What are the plans for migrating to pythia8 in the future?

@wouf
Copy link
Contributor Author

wouf commented Nov 19, 2014

@covarell : for HI, Pythia support is not very important, while it's in CMSSW. At this moment there are not such plans.

@bendavid
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_1_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @ktf, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants