Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make HO information available in PFJet interface #6394

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Nov 19, 2014

Conversation

ahinzmann
Copy link
Contributor

Make HO energy+fraction available in the PFJet interface, pat::Jet, JetValidation, such that it becomes available at user level (in MiniAOD) given the importance of its understanding in Run II for high pT jets.
The actual PF algorithm that includes HO information into PF candidate reconstruction is not modified.
This request is mainly for user convenience.

Attached are plots from 10 events of the runTheMatrix workflow 13.0_QCD_Pt_3000_3500+QCD_Pt_3000_3500+DIGI+RECO+HARVEST.

pfclusterho_energy
pfclusterho_energy
pfcandidate_rawhoenergy
pfcandidate_rawhoenergy
pfjet_hoenergy
pfjet_hoenergy
dqm_hoenergy
dqm_hoenergy
dqm_hoenergyfraction
dqm_hoenergyfraction
HO energy is visible in these high energy jets, and this is visible in the PFjet, so technically it works.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @ahinzmann for CMSSW_7_3_X.

Make HO information available in PFJet interface

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/JetReco
DataFormats/PatCandidates
RecoJets/JetProducers
Validation/RecoJets

@nclopezo, @StoyanStoynev, @danduggan, @rovere, @monttj, @cmsbuild, @deguio, @slava77, @vadler, @ojeda can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@yslai, @nhanvtran, @mariadalfonso, @TaiSakuma, @schoef this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Nov 14, 2014

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_3_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @nclopezo, @ktf, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants