Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix the HGCAL PU workflow + PU datasets #6580

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Nov 25, 2014

Conversation

boudoul
Copy link
Contributor

@boudoul boudoul commented Nov 25, 2014

No description provided.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @boudoul (boudoul) for CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC.

Fix the HGCAL PU workflow + PU datasets

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@cmsbuild, @srimanob, @nclopezo, @boudoul, @franzoni can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@fratnikov, @mark-grimes you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@fratnikov
Copy link

@boudoul Can I test it in any way? I guess it is a relval machinery thus beyond the standard test procedures... Or I may merge it as it is?

@mark-grimes
Copy link

merge

@fratnikov, correct there's not much we can test. I just tried

runTheMatrix.py -w upgrade -l 15000,15200 --dryRun

but all that does is check the python syntax. Not much else we can do.

@boudoul, I see no "refHGCALV5" or "refSHNoTaper" datasets in DAS, but I guess you know what you're doing.

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2014
Fix the HGCAL PU workflow + PU  datasets
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 9427731 into cms-sw:CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC Nov 25, 2014
@boudoul
Copy link
Contributor Author

boudoul commented Nov 25, 2014

hi , I'm travelling with limited connection, but the refHGCALV5_" or "_refSHNoTaper* are indeed there on purpose as I submitted the MinBias today with these lables so once they are announced the test will work, I anticipated my PR before my departure, thank you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants