Fix electron GSF sequence for fastsim HLT (72X)

[perrotta]

Fix for the gsfElectron sequence in FastSim HLT, that showed up since the migration to gsf tracking for electrons.

@matteosan1 @VinInn @beaudett

@lveldere: I let you push this one for the next 72X release for next week's MWGR9 if you think so. (This is not needed for any MWGR, of course, but it can be a good opportunity for having it in).

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @perrotta for CMSSW_7_2_X.

Fix electron GSF sequence for fastsim HLT (72X)

It involves the following packages:

FastSimulation/EgammaElectronAlgos
FastSimulation/HighLevelTrigger
HLTrigger/Configuration

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @civanch, @nclopezo, @lveldere, @mdhildreth, @Martin-Grunewald, @fwyzard can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@geoff-smith, @jalimena this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[Martin-Grunewald]

+1

This is a bug fix, so should go in!

[lveldere]

+1

Thanks Andrea!
I second Martin's statement.

[davidlange6]

is there some reason you expect that it won't go in after its tested and signed? [not that I know why one should be worrying about fastsim in 72x at this point]

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 07280aa
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6772/1421/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6772/1421/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_2_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @nclopezo, @ktf, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1