Root6 version numbers should be known to Root5

[wmtan]

Root6 class version numbers should be known to ROOT5. This prevents serious problems.
This PR is totally technical, as all it does is add version numbers for ROOT6 into the ROOT5 IB. It changes absolutely nothing in ROOT5. No version numbers or checksums or code is modified.
I suggest that L2's be given a reasonable time to sign or comment, and if they do not, the L2 signature(s) should be bypassed.

[wmtan]

I momentarily closed this pull request because this PR was intended for 7_4_X and I requested it for 7_5_X. Further inspection revealed that it is OK for 7_5_X also, so I reopened it.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @wmtan for CMSSW_7_5_X.

Root6 version numbers should be known to Root5

It involves the following packages:

AnalysisDataFormats/SUSYBSMObjects
AnalysisDataFormats/TrackInfo
CondFormats/SiStripObjects
DataFormats/BTauReco
DataFormats/BeamSpot
DataFormats/CaloRecHit
DataFormats/Candidate
DataFormats/DTRecHit
DataFormats/EgammaCandidates
DataFormats/EgammaReco
DataFormats/FEDRawData
DataFormats/GsfTrackReco
DataFormats/HepMCCandidate
DataFormats/L1GlobalCaloTrigger
DataFormats/L1GlobalTrigger
DataFormats/L1Trigger
DataFormats/MuonReco
DataFormats/MuonSeed
DataFormats/ParticleFlowCandidate
DataFormats/ParticleFlowReco
DataFormats/PatCandidates
DataFormats/RecoCandidate
DataFormats/SiStripCommon
DataFormats/TauReco
DataFormats/TrackCandidate
DataFormats/TrackReco
DataFormats/TrackerRecHit2D
DataFormats/TrajectorySeed
FastSimDataFormats/External
FastSimDataFormats/NuclearInteractions
SimDataFormats/GeneratorProducts

@vciulli, @civanch, @diguida, @bendavid, @lveldere, @cvuosalo, @emeschi, @ssekmen, @thuer, @monttj, @cmsbuild, @ggovi, @covarell, @mdhildreth, @cerminar, @slava77, @mommsen, @vadler, @mmusich, @mulhearn, @nclopezo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@apfeiffer1, @Sam-Harper, @imarches, @makortel, @trocino, @acaudron, @abbiendi, @lgray, @jpavel, @threus, @ferencek, @battibass, @VinInn, @pvmulder, @amagitte, @bachtis, @venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@nclopezo, @ktf you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[wmtan]

The test error has nothing whatever to do with this PR

[ktf]

Indeed the file seems MIA. We should probably merge this.

On 6 Mar 2015, at 7:10, wmtan wrote:

The test error has nothing whatever to do with this PR

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#8106 (comment)

[slava77]

+1

for #8106 c5b318d
this is the same commit as in #8107 ; I double-checked that there are no differences in the jenkins comparisons (fwlite and DQM)