Fixes for GainCalibration

[quertenmont]

This was previously called "FixForClusters", but for unknown reason gitHub was not updating the PR8144 with my new push.
(I closed it and made a new PR here)

Nothing striking in these changes...
Most is cleaning up and update for cruzet15 data analysis and run2 preparation

Loic

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @quertenmont (Loic Quertenmont) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

Fixes for GainCalibration

It involves the following packages:

CalibTracker/SiStripChannelGain
CalibTracker/SiStripCommon
CalibTracker/SiStripHitEfficiency

@cmsbuild, @mmusich, @diguida, @cerminar, @nclopezo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@jlagram, @gbenelli, @venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 1903071
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8255/6591/summary.html

[diguida]

@nclopezo
I see that the comparison results are "queued". This means that the bot is executing them, right?

[nclopezo]

@diguida
Hi Salvatore, the workflow 401.0 is failing in the IBs. So the baseline cannot be generated. I queued the tests for this PR with CMSSW_7_5_X_2015-03-12-0200 to be able to get a comparison.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 1903071
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8255/2235/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8255/2235/summary.html

[quertenmont]

Hi all,

Can we please sign and close this PR ?

Loic

[diguida]

@quertenmont
I was giving a look to it last week, then we had a huge queue.
Looking into it

[diguida]

+1
@quertenmont the static analyser reports some issue: I will give you the pointers in the code

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @nclopezo, @ktf, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1