Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

back-port workflowsf from 74x #8579

Conversation

franzoni
Copy link

back-port workflows which are pythia8 in 74 and did not exist at the time of 71

@franzoni
Copy link
Author

please test

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the Next CMSSW_7_1_X milestone Mar 28, 2015
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @franzoni (Giovanni Franzoni) for CMSSW_7_1_X.

back-port workflowsf from 74x

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Generator
Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@vciulli, @covarell, @boudoul, @franzoni, @thuer, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @nclopezo, @bendavid can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1
Tested at: 028434c
you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8579/3895/summary.html

@bendavid
Copy link
Contributor

@franzoni I'm a bit confused. The gen fragment that is being added here is a pythia6 fragment.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #8579 was updated. @vciulli, @covarell, @thuer, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @bendavid can you please check and sign again.

@bendavid
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_1_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @ktf, @smuzaffar

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2015
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit 0c09712 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_1_X Mar 31, 2015
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 1, 2015

+1
Tested at: 1b47dff
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8579/6979/summary.html

#Look at me still talking when there's Science to do. When I look out there, it makes me GLaD I'm not you.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 1, 2015

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8579/6979/summary.html
There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
401.0 step 1
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

#The cake is NOT a lie

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants