Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Path renaming in HLT DQM (JIRA-333) #8894

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 11, 2015

Conversation

silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

This PR fixes the path names changed with https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/CMSHLT-333 (IDLoose -> IDTight)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @silviodonato for CMSSW_7_4_X.

Path renaming in HLT DQM (JIRA-333)

It involves the following packages:

HLTriggerOffline/Higgs

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @nclopezo, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8894/4441/summary.html

The workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Apr 29, 2015

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants