bsunanda:Run2-gem07 Update the latest GEM geometry for GE11

[bsunanda]

Update GE11 geometry with the latest design

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for CMSSW_7_5_X.

bsunanda:Run2-gem07 Update the latest GEM geometry for GE11

It involves the following packages:

Geometry/MuonCommonData

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: ac0ee2f
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9113/4753/summary.html

[ianna]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @nclopezo, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @nclopezo, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9113/5025/summary.html

[davidlange6]

@bsunanda - do we need so many versions of the gem11 file? Can we just keep one?

[bsunanda]

I understand from GEM guys still want several versions of GE11. This is something which I cannot decide. My understanding is that after some time (may be in several months) only one version (or a very few versions) will be kept. I am working on GE21 now and soon there will be 2 versions of that as well.

---

From: David Lange [notifications@github.com]
Sent: 27 May 2015 20:06
To: cms-sw/cmssw
Cc: Sunanda Banerjee
Subject: Re: [cmssw] bsunanda:Run2-gem07 Update the latest GEM geometry for GE11 (#9113)

@bsunandahttps://github.com/bsunanda - do we need so many versions of the gem11 file? Can we just keep one?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/9113#issuecomment-106016195.

[bsunanda]

I checked with GEM DPG and there is a request to keep mutiple versions of GE11 geometry for a while. They still analyze data with a few definitions of GE11.

---

From: Sunanda Banerjee
Sent: 27 May 2015 20:29
To: cms-sw/cmssw; cms-sw/cmssw
Subject: RE: [cmssw] bsunanda:Run2-gem07 Update the latest GEM geometry for GE11 (#9113)

I understand from GEM guys still want several versions of GE11. This is something which I cannot decide. My understanding is that after some time (may be in several months) only one version (or a very few versions) will be kept. I am working on GE21 now and soon there will be 2 versions of that as well.

---

From: David Lange [notifications@github.com]
Sent: 27 May 2015 20:06
To: cms-sw/cmssw
Cc: Sunanda Banerjee
Subject: Re: [cmssw] bsunanda:Run2-gem07 Update the latest GEM geometry for GE11 (#9113)

@bsunandahttps://github.com/bsunanda - do we need so many versions of the gem11 file? Can we just keep one?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/9113#issuecomment-106016195.

[davidlange6]

@bsunanda - analyzing presumably happens in 62XSLHC? Instead, its a question of producing new data. I don't want a bunch of already obsolete geometries to be moved forward to 75x.

[bsunanda]

David, I have not added any new xml file there. They were already there. I just corrected some of them which are to be used.

---

From: David Lange [notifications@github.com]
Sent: 28 May 2015 17:46
To: cms-sw/cmssw
Cc: Sunanda Banerjee
Subject: Re: [cmssw] bsunanda:Run2-gem07 Update the latest GEM geometry for GE11 (#9113)

@bsunandahttps://github.com/bsunanda - analyzing presumably happens in 62XSLHC? Instead, its a question of producing new data. I don't want a bunch of already obsolete geometries to be moved forward to 75x.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/9113#issuecomment-106428785.

[davidlange6]

+1
right - ok - lets plan on getting these soon to be obsolete geometries cleaned when we can