Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Protection for pt=0 ghost candidates in jet flavor clustering (62X_SLHC) #9192

Conversation

ferencek
Copy link
Contributor

Backport of #9186

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @ferencek (Dinko Ferencek) for CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC.

Protection for pt=0 ghost candidates in jet flavor clustering (62X_SLHC)

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/JetMCAlgos

@cmsbuild, @vadler, @nclopezo, @monttj can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ferencek, @acaudron, @pvmulder, @imarches this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@fratnikov, @mark-grimes you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@mark-grimes
Copy link

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@mark-grimes
Copy link

merge

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2015
…_0_SLHC25_patch6

Protection for pt=0 ghost candidates in jet flavor clustering (62X_SLHC)
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit ff06775 into cms-sw:CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC May 22, 2015
@ferencek ferencek deleted the JetFlavorFix_from-CMSSW_6_2_0_SLHC25_patch6 branch May 27, 2015 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants