Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

puppi bug fix for low PU case #9338

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 6, 2015

Conversation

nhanvtran
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, a small bug fix for PUPPI in the case of very low PU (< 5 nPU) that was not included in the first PR for 75X.

Thanks

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @nhanvtran for CMSSW_7_5_X.

puppi bug fix for low PU case

It involves the following packages:

CommonTools/PileupAlgos

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @vadler, @monttj, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ahinzmann, @jdolen, @rappoccio this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented May 29, 2015

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

@nhanvtran: Is there any simple way to verify if your bug fix is working? What test procedure would show its effectiveness? The Jenkins tests show no differences.
Also, in the PR description, please give the PR number of other PR you mention.

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

cvuosalo commented Jun 4, 2015

+1

For #9338 35a35c3

A PUPPI bug fix to cover the case of very low pile-up.

The code changes are satisfactory, and Jenkins tests showed no significant differences before they were mysteriously deleted. Tests of the Mini-AOD step of workflow 25202.0_TTbar_13 against baseline CMSSW_7_5_X_2015-05-28-2300 show little change in product size and some improvements in CPU time:

Product size
-------------------------------------------------------------
 or, B       new, B      delta, B   delta, %   deltaJ, %    branch 
-------------------------------------------------------------
    20096 ->       20102          6      0.0   0.01     patPackedCandidates_packedPFCandidates__PAT.
     3333 ->        3342          9      0.3   0.01     patJets_slimmedJetsPuppi__PAT.
     2676 ->        2676          0      0.0   0.00     patTaus_slimmedTaus__PAT.
     7873 ->        7874          0      0.0   0.00     patMuons_slimmedMuons__PAT.
     1061 ->        1061         -0     -0.0  -0.00     recoSuperClusters_reducedEgamma_reducedSuperClusters_PAT.
     1059 ->        1059          0      0.0   0.00     patMETs_slimmedMETsPuppi__PAT.
     4316 ->        4317          0      0.0   0.00     patPackedGenParticles_packedGenParticles__PAT.
      594 ->         594          0      0.0   0.00     patPackedCandidates_lostTracks__PAT.
     6212 ->        6213          0      0.0   0.00     patElectrons_slimmedElectrons__PAT.
-------------------------------------------------------------
    80852 ->       80868         16             0.0     ALL BRANCHES

CPU timing
  delta/mean delta/orJob     original                   new       module name
 ---------- ------------     --------                  ----       ------------
   -0.197677      -0.20%        17.98 ms/ev ->        14.74 ms/ev prunedGenParticles
   -0.165684      -1.10%       113.47 ms/ev ->        96.11 ms/ev pfImpactParameterTagInfos
   -0.148244      -0.34%        39.00 ms/ev ->        33.61 ms/ev pfImpactParameterTagInfosPuppi
   -0.143759      -0.13%        15.02 ms/ev ->        13.01 ms/ev pfImpactParameterTagInfosAK8
   -0.109312      -0.54%        82.18 ms/ev ->        73.66 ms/ev prunedGenParticlesWithStatusOne
   -0.093345      -0.11%        19.85 ms/ev ->        18.08 ms/ev patJets
   -0.072463      -0.18%        40.11 ms/ev ->        37.31 ms/ev pfCandsNotInJetsPtrForMetCorr
   +0.072287      +0.71%       148.82 ms/ev ->       159.98 ms/ev primaryVertexAssociation
   -0.067441      -0.02%         5.61 ms/ev ->         5.24 ms/ev patPFJetMETtype1p2CorrEnDown
   +0.064363      +0.03%         6.13 ms/ev ->         6.54 ms/ev patJetCorrFactors
   -0.059031      -0.02%         5.83 ms/ev ->         5.49 ms/ev patPFJetMETtype1p2CorrEnUp
   -0.055614      -0.09%        26.21 ms/ev ->        24.79 ms/ev tauIsoDepositPFCandidates
   +0.055359      +0.03%         7.29 ms/ev ->         7.70 ms/ev patJetCorrFactorsAK4PFForMetUnc
---------- ------------     --------                  ----       ------------
Job total:  1.57837 s/ev ==> 1.53356 s/ev

@nhanvtran
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cvuosalo
the other PR was #9142

So it basically only changes the behavior of the algorithm for < 5 PU so you won't see many differences, not sure of an obvious workflow to test it...

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2015
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit d89f709 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_5_X Jun 6, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants