Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New dqm modules for PFHT paths (rebase of #9027) #9339

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 16, 2015

Conversation

jruizvar
Copy link
Contributor

Add dqm modules for the new PFHT triggers.

This pull request supersedes #9027

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @jruizvar (Jose Cupertino Ruiz Vargas) for CMSSW_7_4_X.

New dqm modules for PFHT paths (rebase of #9027)

It involves the following packages:

HLTriggerOffline/SUSYBSM

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 1, 2015

@cmsbot please test

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Jun 4, 2015

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2015

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2015

-1
Tested at: b4ffa41
you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9339/5284/summary.html

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Jun 8, 2015

+1
this PR adds 2340 bins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2015

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants