Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

62 x met uncertainties integration test #977

Merged

Conversation

vadler
Copy link

@vadler vadler commented Oct 2, 2013

Adding integration test for MET uncertainties in unscheduled mode.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 2, 2013

A new Pull Request was created by @vadler (Volker Adler) for CMSSW_6_2_X.

62 x met uncertainties integration test

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/PatUtils
PhysicsTools/PatAlgos

@smuzaffar, @nclopezo, @vadler can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@davidlt you are the release manager for this.

@vadler
Copy link
Author

vadler commented Oct 3, 2013

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2013

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. @davidlt can you please take care of it?

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Oct 4, 2013

+1

@ghost ghost assigned davidlt Oct 6, 2013
davidlt added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2013
@davidlt davidlt merged commit ba5587e into cms-sw:CMSSW_6_2_X Oct 6, 2013
@vadler vadler deleted the 62X-metUncertaintiesIntegrationTest branch February 21, 2014 15:48
epalencia added a commit to epalencia/cmssw that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2022
DoubleTauOvRm and DoubleJetOvRm added ... (backport from master)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants